An Anatomically Validated Brachial Plexus Contouring Method for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning

被引:24
作者
Van de Velde, Joris [1 ,2 ]
Audenaert, Emmanuel [4 ]
Speleers, Bruno [2 ]
Vercauteren, Tom [2 ]
Mulliez, Thomas [2 ]
Vandemaele, Pieter [3 ]
Achten, Eric [3 ]
Kerckaert, Ingrid [1 ]
D'Herde, Katharina [1 ]
De Neve, Wilfried [2 ]
Van Hoof, Tom [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Anat, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Radiotherapy, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Radiol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[4] Univ Ghent, Dept Phys Med & Orthoped Surg, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2013年 / 87卷 / 04期
关键词
NECK-CANCER; HEAD; RADIOTHERAPY; ORGANS; ATLAS; MODEL; IMRT; RISK; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.08.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop contouring guidelines for the brachial plexus (BP) using anatomically validated cadaver datasets. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) were used to obtain detailed visualizations of the BP region, with the goal of achieving maximal inclusion of the actual BP in a small contoured volume while also accommodating for anatomic variations. Methods and Materials: CT and MRI were obtained for 8 cadavers positioned for intensity modulated radiation therapy. 3-dimensional reconstructions of soft tissue (from MRI) and bone (from CT) were combined to create 8 separate enhanced CT project files. Dissection of the corresponding cadavers anatomically validated the reconstructions created. Seven enhanced CT project files were then automatically fitted, separately in different regions, to obtain a single dataset of superimposed BP regions that incorporated anatomic variations. From this dataset, improved BP contouring guidelines were developed. These guidelines were then applied to the 7 original CT project files and also to 1 additional file, left out from the superimposing procedure. The percentage of BP inclusion was compared with the published guidelines. Results: The anatomic validation procedure showed a high level of conformity for the BP regions examined between the 3-dimensional reconstructions generated and the dissected counterparts. Accurate and detailed BP contouring guidelines were developed, which provided corresponding guidance for each level in a clinical dataset. An average margin of 4.7 mm around the anatomically validated BP contour is sufficient to accommodate for anatomic variations. Using the new guidelines, 100% inclusion of the BP was achieved, compared with a mean inclusion of 37.75% when published guidelines were applied. Conclusion: Improved guidelines for BP delineation were developed using combined MRI and CT imaging with validation by anatomic dissection. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:802 / 808
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Script-Based Automatic Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning Method With Robust Optimization for Craniospinal Irradiation
    Wang, Xuetao
    Li, Changhu
    Li, Guangjun
    Zhao, Jianling
    Bai, Sen
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13 (02) : e209 - e215
  • [32] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: Radiation dosage constraint at the anterior mandible
    Verdonck, Henk W. D.
    de Jong, Jos M. A.
    Granzier, Marlies E. P. G.
    Nieman, Fred H.
    de Baat, Cees
    Stoelinga, Paul J. W.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 45 (06) : 511 - 514
  • [33] Impact of intravenous contrast used in computed tomography on radiation dose to carotid arteries and thyroid in intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Lee, Victor Ho Fun
    Ng, Sherry Chor Yi
    Kwong, Dora Lai Wan
    Lam, Ka On
    Leung, To Wai
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2017, 42 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [34] Comparative dosimetry of volumetric modulated arc therapy and limited-angle static intensity-modulated radiation therapy for early-stage larynx cancer
    Riegel, Adam C.
    Antone, Jeffrey
    Schwartz, David L.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (01) : 66 - 69
  • [35] Which T Category of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma May Benefit Most from Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Compared with Step and Shoot Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Sun, Ying
    Guo, Rui
    Yin, Wen-Jing
    Tang, Ling-Long
    Yu, Xiao-Li
    Chen, Mo
    Qi, Zhen-Yu
    Liu, Meng-Zhong
    Ma, Jun
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09):
  • [36] Economical Evaluation of Cancer Types Using Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Compared to 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review
    Alipour, Vahid
    Rezapour, Aziz
    Adel, Amin
    Pourtaleb, Arefeh
    Bazrafshan, Mitra
    Mohammadi, Mozhgan Sadat Ghaem
    Jahangiri, Reza
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 52 (07) : 1355 - 1366
  • [37] Direct machine parameter optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of oropharyngeal cancer - a planning study
    Dobler, Barbara
    Koelbl, Oliver
    Bogner, Ludwig
    Pohl, Fabian
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 10 (04): : 4 - 15
  • [38] Increased Recurrences Using Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in the Postoperative Setting
    Turaka, Aruna
    Li, Tianyu
    Sharma, Navesh K.
    Li, Linna
    Nicolaou, Nicos
    Mehra, Ranee
    Burtness, Barbara
    Cohen, Roger B.
    Lango, Miriam N.
    Horwitz, Eric M.
    Ridge, John A.
    Feigenberg, Steven J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2010, 33 (06): : 599 - 603
  • [39] Artificial intelligence applications in intensity modulated radiation treatment planning: an overview
    Sheng, Yang
    Zhang, Jiahan
    Ge, Yaorong
    Li, Xinyi
    Wang, Wentao
    Stephens, Hunter
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    Wu, Qiuwen
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2021, 11 (12) : 4859 - 4880
  • [40] Dosimetric study of beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning
    Shukla, Arvind Kumar
    Kumar, Sanjeev
    Sandhu, I. S.
    Oinam, Arun S.
    Singh, Ranjit
    Kapoor, Rakesh
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 12 (02) : 1045 - 1049