An Anatomically Validated Brachial Plexus Contouring Method for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning

被引:24
|
作者
Van de Velde, Joris [1 ,2 ]
Audenaert, Emmanuel [4 ]
Speleers, Bruno [2 ]
Vercauteren, Tom [2 ]
Mulliez, Thomas [2 ]
Vandemaele, Pieter [3 ]
Achten, Eric [3 ]
Kerckaert, Ingrid [1 ]
D'Herde, Katharina [1 ]
De Neve, Wilfried [2 ]
Van Hoof, Tom [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Anat, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Radiotherapy, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Radiol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[4] Univ Ghent, Dept Phys Med & Orthoped Surg, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2013年 / 87卷 / 04期
关键词
NECK-CANCER; HEAD; RADIOTHERAPY; ORGANS; ATLAS; MODEL; IMRT; RISK; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.08.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop contouring guidelines for the brachial plexus (BP) using anatomically validated cadaver datasets. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) were used to obtain detailed visualizations of the BP region, with the goal of achieving maximal inclusion of the actual BP in a small contoured volume while also accommodating for anatomic variations. Methods and Materials: CT and MRI were obtained for 8 cadavers positioned for intensity modulated radiation therapy. 3-dimensional reconstructions of soft tissue (from MRI) and bone (from CT) were combined to create 8 separate enhanced CT project files. Dissection of the corresponding cadavers anatomically validated the reconstructions created. Seven enhanced CT project files were then automatically fitted, separately in different regions, to obtain a single dataset of superimposed BP regions that incorporated anatomic variations. From this dataset, improved BP contouring guidelines were developed. These guidelines were then applied to the 7 original CT project files and also to 1 additional file, left out from the superimposing procedure. The percentage of BP inclusion was compared with the published guidelines. Results: The anatomic validation procedure showed a high level of conformity for the BP regions examined between the 3-dimensional reconstructions generated and the dissected counterparts. Accurate and detailed BP contouring guidelines were developed, which provided corresponding guidance for each level in a clinical dataset. An average margin of 4.7 mm around the anatomically validated BP contour is sufficient to accommodate for anatomic variations. Using the new guidelines, 100% inclusion of the BP was achieved, compared with a mean inclusion of 37.75% when published guidelines were applied. Conclusion: Improved guidelines for BP delineation were developed using combined MRI and CT imaging with validation by anatomic dissection. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:802 / 808
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] External evaluation of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group brachial plexus contouring protocol: Several issues identified
    Min, Myo
    Roos, Daniel
    Keating, Elly
    Penniment, Michael
    Carruthers, Scott
    Zanchetta, Lydia
    Wong, Karen
    Shakeshaft, John
    Baxi, Siddhartha
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 58 (03) : 360 - 368
  • [2] Reliability and accuracy assessment of radiation therapy oncology group-endorsed guidelines for brachial plexus contouring
    Van de Velde, Joris
    Vercauteren, Tom
    De Gersem, Werner
    Wouters, Johan
    Vandecasteele, Katrien
    Vuye, Philippe
    Vanpachtenbeke, Frank
    D'Herde, Katharina
    Kerckaert, Ingrid
    De Neve, Wilfried
    Van Hoof, Tom
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2014, 190 (07) : 628 - +
  • [3] Radiation dose to the brachial plexus in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: An increased risk of an excessive dose to the brachial plexus adjacent to gross nodal disease
    Feng, Guosheng
    Lu, Heming
    Liang, Yuan
    Chen, Huasheng
    Shu, Liuyang
    Lu, Shui
    Zhu, Jianfang
    Gao, Weiwei
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2012, 4 (02) : 216 - 220
  • [4] Osteoradionecrosis and intensity modulated radiation therapy: An overview
    De Felice, Francesca
    Musio, Daniela
    Tombolini, Vincenzo
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2016, 107 : 39 - 43
  • [5] Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Thomas, Tarita O.
    Refaat, Tamer
    Choi, Mehee
    Bacchus, Ian
    Sachdev, Sean
    Rademaker, Alfred W.
    Sathiaseelan, Vythialingam
    Karagianis, Achilles
    Mittal, Bharat B.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10
  • [6] Atlas-guided prostate intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning
    Sheng, Yang
    Li, Taoran
    Zhang, You
    Lee, W. Robert
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    Ge, Yaorong
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (18) : 7277 - 7291
  • [7] A method for standardizing intensity modulated radiation therapy planning optimization for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Pang, H.
    Lin, S.
    Yang, B.
    Wu, J.
    Sun, X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (01): : 177 - 181
  • [8] Inverse Planning Optimization Method for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Lan, Yihua
    Ren, Haozheng
    Li, Cunhua
    Min, Zhifang
    Wan, Jinxin
    Ma, Jianxin
    Hung, Chih-Cheng
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2013, 12 (05) : 391 - 401
  • [9] Intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Maingon, P.
    Marchesi, V.
    Crehange, G.
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2010, 97 (07) : 759 - 768
  • [10] Dosimetric benefits of placing dose constraints on the brachial plexus in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a comparative study
    Jiang, Hailan
    Lu, Heming
    Yuan, Hong
    Huang, Huixian
    Wei, Yinglin
    Zhang, Yanxian
    Liu, Xu
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2015, 56 (01) : 114 - 121