Single-trial EEG dissociates motivation and conflict processes during decision-making under risk

被引:20
作者
Pornpattananangkul, Narun [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Grogans, Shannon [1 ,3 ]
Yu, Rongjun [2 ]
Nusslock, Robin [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Psychol, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Psychol, Singapore 117570, Singapore
[3] NIMH, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[4] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol, William James Bldg,275 Leith Walk, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Decision under risk; Single-trial EEG; P3; Delta power; Alpha and beta suppression; Hierarchical Bayesian modeling; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE-VARIATION; REWARD ANTICIPATION; COGNITIVE CONTROL; PROSPECT-THEORY; LOSS AVERSION; MONETARY LOSS; BRAIN; P300; COMPONENTS; MOTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.029
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In making decisions under risk (i.e., choosing whether to gamble when the outcome probabilities are known), two aspects of decision are of particular concern. The first, if gambling, is how large are potential gains compared to losses? The subjectively larger, the more rewarding to gamble. Thus, this aspect of decision-making, quantified through expected utility (EU), is motivation-related. The second concern is how easy is it to reach the decision? When subjective desirability between gambling and not-gambling is clearly different from each other (regardless of the direction), it is easier to decide. This aspect, quantified through utility distance (UD), is conflict-related. It is unclear how the brain simultaneously processes these two aspects of decision-making. Forty-five participants decided whether to gamble during electroencephalogram (EEG) recording. To compute trial-by-trial variability in EU and UD, we fit participants' choices to models inspired by Expected-Utility and Prospect theories using hierarchical-Bayesian modeling. To examine unique influences of EU and UD, we conducted model-based single trial EEG analyses with EU and UD as simultaneous regressors. While both EU and UD were positively associated with P3-like activity and delta-band power, the contribution of EU was around 200 ms earlier. Thus, during decision-making under risk, people may allocate their attention to motivation-related aspects before conflict related aspects. Next, following learning the options and before reporting their decision, higher EU was associated with stronger alpha and beta suppression, while higher UD was associated with a stronger contingent negativity -variation-like activity. This suggests distinct roles of EU and UD on anticipation-related processes. Overall, we identified time and frequency characteristics of EEG signals that differentially traced motivation related and conflict-related information during decision-making under risk.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 501
页数:19
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
Ahn Woo-Young, 2017, Comput Psychiatr, V1, P24, DOI 10.1162/CPSY_a_00002
[2]  
Ahn Woo-Young, 2011, J Neurosci Psychol Econ, V4, P95
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing
[4]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[5]   The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value [J].
Bartra, Oscar ;
McGuire, Joseph T. ;
Kable, Joseph W. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2013, 76 (01) :412-427
[6]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[7]   Independent effects of motivation and spatial attention in the human visual cortex [J].
Bayer, Mareike ;
Rossi, Valentina ;
Vanlessen, Naomi ;
Grass, Annika ;
Schacht, Annekathrin ;
Pourtois, Gilles .
SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 12 (01) :146-156
[8]   It is less than you expected: The feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations [J].
Bellebaum, Christian ;
Polezzi, David ;
Daum, Irene .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2010, 48 (11) :3343-3350
[9]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[10]   EXPOSITION OF A NEW THEORY ON THE MEASUREMENT OF RISK [J].
Bernoulli, Daniel .
ECONOMETRICA, 1954, 22 (01) :23-36