Water hammer reduces fouling during natural water ultrafiltration

被引:9
作者
Broens, F. [2 ]
Menne, D. [1 ]
Pothof, I.
Blankert, B. [3 ]
Roesink, H. D. W. [3 ]
Futselaar, H. [3 ]
Lammertink, R. G. H. [4 ]
Wessling, M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Chem Proc Engn AVT CVT, D-52056 Aachen, Germany
[2] Convergence BV, NL-7418 EV Deventer, Netherlands
[3] Pentair X Flow BV, NL-7500 AS Enschede, Netherlands
[4] Univ Twente, Membrane Technol Grp, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Ultrafiltration; Water hammer; Fouling; FLUX-STEP METHOD; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MICROFILTRATION; FILTRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Today's ultrafiltration processes use permeate flow reversal to remove fouling deposits on the feed side of ultrafiltration membranes. We report an as effective method: the opening and rapid closing of a valve on the permeate side of an ultrafiltration module. The sudden valve closure generates pressure fluctuations due to fluid inertia and is commonly known as "water hammer". Surface water was filtrated in hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes with a small (5%) crossflow. Filtration experiments above sustainable flux levels (>125 l (m(2)h)(-1)) show that a periodic closure of a valve on the permeate side improves filtration performance as a consequence of reduced fouling. It was shown that this effect depends on flux and actuation frequency of the valve. The time period that the valve was closed proved to have no effect on filtration performance. The pressure fluctuations generated by the sudden stop in fluid motion due to the valve closure are responsible for the effect of fouling reduction. High frequency recording of the dynamic pressure evolution shows water hammer related pressure fluctuations to occur in the order of 0.1 bar. The pressure fluctuations were higher at higher fluxes (higher velocities) which is in agreement with the theory. They were also more effective at higher fluxes with respect to fouling mitigation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1113 / 1120
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Slow colloidal aggregation and membrane fouling [J].
Aimar, Pierre ;
Bacchin, Patrice .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2010, 360 (1-2) :70-76
[2]   Critical and sustainable fluxes: Theory, experiments and applications [J].
Bacchin, P. ;
Aimar, P. ;
Field, R. W. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 281 (1-2) :42-69
[3]   Critical fouling conditions induced by colloidal surface interaction: from causes to consequences [J].
Bacchin, P ;
Aimar, P .
DESALINATION, 2005, 175 (01) :21-27
[4]   The effect of oscillatory flow on crossflow microfiltration of beer in a tubular mineral membrane system - Membrane fouling resistance decrease and energetic considerations [J].
Blanpain-Avet, P ;
Doubrovine, N ;
Lafforgue, C ;
Lalande, M .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1999, 152 (02) :151-174
[5]   Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment [J].
Chang, IS ;
Le Clech, P ;
Jefferson, B ;
Judd, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (11) :1018-1029
[6]   Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: comparison of flux decline, NOM rejection, and foulants during filtration with three UF membranes [J].
Cho, JW ;
Amy, G ;
Pellegrino, J .
DESALINATION, 2000, 127 (03) :283-298
[7]   CRITICAL FLUX CONCEPT FOR MICROFILTRATION FOULING [J].
FIELD, RW ;
WU, D ;
HOWELL, JA ;
GUPTA, BB .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1995, 100 (03) :259-272
[8]   Vibrating polymeric microsieves:: Antifouling strategies for microfiltration [J].
Girones i Nogue, Miriam ;
Akbarsyah, Imam J. ;
Bolhuis-Versteeg, Lydia A. M. ;
Lammertink, Rob G. H. ;
Wessling, Matthias .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 285 (1-2) :323-333
[9]  
Kartvelishvili L.N., 1994, HYDROTECHNICAL CONST, V28, P559
[10]   Critical flux determination by the flux-step method in a submerged membrane bioreactor [J].
Le Clech, P ;
Jefferson, B ;
Chang, IS ;
Judd, SJ .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2003, 227 (1-2) :81-93