The Wisconsin gait scale - The minimal clinically important difference

被引:10
作者
Guzik, Agnieszka [1 ,2 ]
Druzbickia, Mariusz [1 ,2 ]
Wolan-Nieroda, Andzelina [1 ,2 ]
Przysada, Grzegorz [1 ,2 ]
Kwolek, Andrzej [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rzeszow, Med Fac, Inst Physiotherapy, Hoffmanowej 25, PL-35310 Rzeszow, Poland
[2] Univ Rzeszow, Ctr Innovat Res Med & Nat Sci, Warzywna 1a, PL-35310 Rzeszow, Poland
关键词
Minimal clinically important difference; Stroke; Gait; Hemiplegia; HEALTH-STATUS; BARTHEL INDEX; STROKE; RELIABILITY; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.12.036
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Wisconsin Gait Scale (WGS) is an observational tool for the evaluation of gait quality in individuals after stroke with hemiplegia. It is divided into four subscales, which assess a total of fourteen spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters of gait observed during the consecutive gait phases. However, the WGS score change indicative of important and clinically meaningful change has not been determined. Research question: The study has been designed to define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the WGS. Methods: Four methods were used to determine the MCID for the WGS in 50 participants who had experienced a stroke: anchor-based study, distribution-based study, linear regression analysis and specification of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: In the anchor-based study, the mean change score in the MCID group was 1.9 points (the first MCID estimate). In the distribution-based study, the standard error of measurement for the no-change group was 0.3 (the second MCID estimate). The slope of the regression line was 1.21 which means than 1-point change in the Barthel Index (BI) is associated with 1.21-point change in the WGS. This translates to 2.25 points change in the WGS with 1.85 points change in the BI (the third MCID estimate). The best cut-off point, determined with ROC curve, was the value corresponding to 1 point of change in the WGS (the fourth MCID estimate). Significance: We established that the MCID of the WGS was 2.25 points, based on the largest of the four MCID estimates. The value 2.25 of the MCID can help clinicians and researchers determine if the change in the scores on the WGS is clinically important.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 457
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ADV REHAB
[2]   Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke [J].
Beninato, M ;
Gill-Body, KM ;
Salles, S ;
Stark, PC ;
Black-Schaffer, RM ;
Stein, J .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 87 (01) :32-39
[3]  
Collin C, 1988, Int Disabil Stud, V10, P61
[4]   Tools for Observational Gait Analysis in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review [J].
Ferrarello, Francesco ;
Bianchi, Valeria Anna Maria ;
Baccini, Marco ;
Rubbieri, Gaia ;
Mossello, Enrico ;
Cavallini, Maria Chiara ;
Marchionni, Niccolo ;
Di Bari, Mauro .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2013, 93 (12) :1673-1685
[5]   A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients [J].
Green, J ;
Forster, A ;
Young, J .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 23 (15) :670-676
[6]   Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures [J].
Guyatt, GH ;
Osoba, D ;
Wu, AW ;
Wyrwich, KW ;
Norman, GR .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 77 (04) :371-383
[7]   An assessment of the relationship between the items of the observational Wisconsin Gait Scale and the 3-dimensional spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters in post-stroke gait [J].
Guzik, Agnieszka ;
Druzbicki, Mariusz ;
Przysada, Grzegorz ;
Brzozowska-Magon, Agnieszka ;
Wolan-Nieroda, Andzelina ;
Kwolek, Andrzej .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2018, 62 :75-79
[8]   Analysis of consistency between temporospatial gait parameters and gait assessment with the use of Wisconsin Gait Scale in post-stroke patients [J].
Guzik, Agnieszka ;
Druzbicki, Mariusz ;
Przysada, Grzegorz ;
Kwolek, Andrzej ;
Brzozowska-Magon, Agnieszka ;
Wolan-Nieroda, Andzelina .
NEUROLOGIA I NEUROCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2017, 51 (01) :60-65
[9]   The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain [J].
Hägg, O ;
Fritzell, P ;
Nordwall, A .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2003, 12 (01) :12-20
[10]  
Hastie T., 2009, The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7