Evaluation of arsenic immobilization in red mud by CO2 or waste acid acidification combined ferrous (Fe2+) treatment

被引:12
作者
Li, Yiran [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jun [1 ]
Peng, Xianjia [1 ]
Ni, Fan [1 ]
Luan, Zhaokun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Ecoenvironm Sci Res Ctr, State Key Lab Environm Aquat Chem, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[2] E China Inst Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Fuzhou 344000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Arsenic immobilization; Acidification; Ferrous; Red mud; AQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS; REMOVAL; SILICATE; REMEDIATION; ADSORPTION; OXIDATION; CARBONATE; PHOSPHATE; SULFATE; SOILS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.055
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Arsenic was detected in a red mud (RM) produced during alumina production from bauxite known as the Bayer process. The transporting RM was a mixture of RM solid phase (RMsf) and RM liquid phase (RMlf). The mass content of RMsf in RM is about 30-40%. The alkalinities concentrations in the RMlf were in a range of 37.2 x 10(3) mg/l to 51.5 x 10(3) mg/l. Acidification by CO2 or waste acid (WA) combined with ferrous (Fe2+) treatment was evaluated for arsenic immobilization in the RM. The aqueous arsenic concentration in the RMlf decreased from 6.1 mg/l to 0.5 mg/l and 0.06 mg/l with the addition of CO2 and WA, respectively. Ferrous was then added to decrease the aqueous arsenic concentration to be lower than 0.05 mg/l. The cost-effective dosages of CO2 or WA were 80.1 g/l or 26.7 g/l, and the corresponding dosages of ferrous were both 6g/l. A 2(3) full factorial design was employed to evaluate the importance of chemical components of the RM in the cost of arsenic immobilization. High concentrations of arsenic and alkalinities in the RM will increase the cost while the effects of alumina contents varied during the different acidifications. Dissolvable arsenic in the RMsf was 8.2% and 9.5% after the CO2 and WA combined ferrous treatments, respectively. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 50
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Altundogan HS, 2000, WASTE MANAGE, V20, P761
  • [2] As(V) removal from aqueous solutions by coagulation with liquid phase of red mud
    Altundogan, HS
    Tümen, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 38 (07): : 1247 - 1258
  • [3] Iron(II)-catalyzed oxidation of arsenic(III) in a sediment column
    Bisceglia, KJ
    Rader, KJ
    Carbonaro, RF
    Farley, KJ
    Mahony, JD
    Di Toro, DM
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (23) : 9217 - 9222
  • [4] Removal of nitrate from aqueous solution by using red mud
    Cengeloglu, Yunus
    Tor, Ali
    Ersoz, Mustafa
    Arslan, Gulsin
    [J]. SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 51 (03) : 374 - 378
  • [5] Surface properties of red mud particles from potentiometric titration
    Chvedov, D
    Ostap, S
    Le, T
    [J]. COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 2001, 182 (1-3) : 131 - 141
  • [6] Role of Fe(II), phosphate, silicate, sulfate, and carbonate in arsenic uptake by coprecipitation in synthetic and natural groundwater
    Ciardelli, Mark C.
    Xu, Huifang
    Sahai, Nita
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2008, 42 (03) : 615 - 624
  • [7] Visualization experiments of iron precipitates: Application for in-situ arsenic remediation
    Darwish, MIM
    van Beek, VM
    Bruining, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION, 2006, 88 (1-3) : 19 - 23
  • [8] Doyle P, 2010, HUNGARY TOXIC DISAST
  • [9] Remediation technologies for arsenic contaminated drinking waters
    Garelick, H
    Dybowska, A
    Valsami-Jones, E
    Priest, ND
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, 2005, 5 (03) : 182 - 190
  • [10] Adsorption of arsenic from water using activated neutralized red mud
    Genç-Fuhrman, H
    Tjell, JC
    McConchie, D
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (08) : 2428 - 2434