Utility of Maximum Standard Uptake Value as a Predictor for Differentiating the Invasiveness of T1 Stage Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) have been categorized as "less-invasive tumors" and are significantly different from invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). The present study showed that a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 2.15 as the cutoff value for 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2deoxy- D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography could be used to differentiate AIS and MIA from IAC preoperatively. The predictive sensitivity and specificity of the SUVmax were 83.6% and 93.3%, respectively. Background: The present study was performed to investigate the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (F-18-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to preoperatively distinguish invasive from less-invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods: A total of 106 patients with resectable pulmonary adenocarcinoma (<= 3 cm) who had undergone whole-body F-18-FDG PET/CT were enrolled. The SUVmax, diameter, and consolidation/tumor (C/T) ratio of the lung tumors were measured with F-18-FDG PET/CT and regional thin-section CT. Results: Of the 106 patients, 32 had adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), 13 had minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and 61 had invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). IAC lesions showed greater uptake of F-18-FDG, a larger tumor diameter, and greater C/T ratios than AIS and MIA (P < .001 for all). A multivariate analysis revealed that only the SUVmax, tumor diameter, and C/T ratio were independent risk factors for tumor invasiveness (P < .05 for all). The best cutoff values for the prediction of invasiveness were 2.15 for the SUVmax, 1.36 cm for the tumor diameter, and 0.36 for the C/T ratio. The SUVmax, tumor diameter, and C/T ratio showed similar predictive sensitivity (83.6%, 82.0%, and 88.5%, respectively). However, the SUVmax showed a greater predictive specificity than the C/T ratio (93.3% vs. 73.3%, respectively; P = .011) but similar to that of the tumor diameter. The predictive sensitivity and specificity were not improved using the 3 combined parameters compared with SUVmax alone. Conclusion: The present study has demonstrated that the SUVmax is a good preoperative predictor for the invasiveness of pulmonary adenocarcinoma (<= 3 cm). It will help surgeons plan low invasive treatment of preinvasive tumors. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.