Y chromosomal and sex effects on the behavioral stress response in the defensive burying test in wild house mice

被引:16
作者
Sluyter, F
Korte, SM
Van Baal, GCM
De Ruiter, AJH
Van Oortmerssen, GA
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen, Dept Psychopharmacol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] DLO, Inst Anim Sci & Hlth, ID, Dept Behav Stress Physiol & Management, NL-2200 AB Lelystad, Netherlands
[3] Free Univ Amsterdam, Dept Biol Psychol, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Dept Anim Physiol, NL-9750 AA Haren, Netherlands
关键词
aggression; defensive burying; SAL/LAL mice; behavioral strategies; sex differences; Y chromosome; stress;
D O I
10.1016/S0031-9384(99)00101-8
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Genetically selected short attack latency (SAL) and long attack latency (LAL) male wild house mice behave differently in the defensive burying test. When challenged, SAL males respond actively with more time spent on defensive burying, whereas LAL males are more passive with more time remaining immobile. The first aim of this study was to find out whether the nonpairing part of the Y chromosome (Y(NPAR)) affects the behavioral stress response in this paradigm. Second, to determine if the differential behavioral profile found in males is also present in females, SAL and LAL females were tested. Third, nonattacking and attacking LAL males were compared. Five behavioral elements were recorded: defensive burying, immobility, rearing, grooming, and exploration. Males were first tested for attack latency. The results show that the Y(NPAR) influences defensive burying. However, the size of this effect is overshadowed by the background of the mice. Furthermore, although females differed from males, they tended to demonstrate the same behavioral profile as males. Nongenetic factors may also play a role, as attacking LAL males showed more defensive burying than nonattacking LAL males. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 585
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Patterns of maternal effort in mouse lines bidirectionally selected for aggression [J].
Benus, RF ;
Rondigs, M .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1996, 51 :67-75
[2]   HERITABLE VARIATION FOR AGGRESSION AS A REFLECTION OF INDIVIDUAL COPING STRATEGIES [J].
BENUS, RF ;
BOHUS, B ;
KOOLHAAS, JM ;
VANOORTMERSSEN, GA .
EXPERIENTIA, 1991, 47 (10) :1008-1019
[3]  
Bohus B, 1987, PROG BRAIN RES <D>, V72, P57
[4]  
Carlier M., 1992, V8, P111
[5]  
CATLETT ROBERT H., 1961, ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, V9, P8, DOI 10.1016/0003-3472(61)90042-2
[6]   GENETIC-DIFFERENCES IN FEMALE HOUSE MICE IN AGGRESSIVE RESPONSE TO SEX STEROID-HORMONE TREATMENT [J].
COMPAAN, JC ;
VANWATTUM, G ;
DERUITER, AJH ;
VANOORTMERSSEN, GA ;
KOOLHAAS, JM ;
BOHUS, B .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1993, 54 (05) :899-902
[7]   SEARCH AFTER NEUROBIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF INDIVIDUAL-SPECIFIC FEATURES OF WISTAR RATS [J].
COOLS, AR ;
BRACHTEN, R ;
HEEREN, D ;
WILLEMEN, A ;
ELLENBROEK, B .
BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 1990, 24 (01) :49-69
[8]  
DEBOER SF, 1991, ADV PHAR SC, P81
[9]   DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARD STIMULUS ANIMALS FOR MOUSE (MUS-MUSCULUS) AGGRESSION TESTING BY MEANS OF OLFACTORY BULBECTOMY [J].
DENENBERG, VH ;
GAULINKR.E ;
GANDELMAN, R ;
ZARROW, MX .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1973, 21 (AUG) :590-598
[10]   SELECTION FOR 2-WAY AVOIDANCE DEFICIT INHIBITS SHOCK-INDUCED FIGHTING IN THE RAT [J].
DRISCOLL, P ;
WOODSON, P ;
FUEMM, H ;
BAETTIG, K .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1980, 24 (04) :793-795