Computer assistive technology and associations with quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review

被引:33
作者
Baldassin, Valeria [1 ,4 ]
Shimizu, Helena Eri [2 ]
Fachin-Martins, Emerson [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brasilia, Rede SARAH Hosp Reabilita, Programa Posgrad Bioet, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[2] Univ Brasilia, Programa Posgrad Bioet, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[3] Univ Brasilia, NTAAI, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[4] SMHS 501 Bloco A, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
Spinal cord injury; Quality of life; Self-help equipment; ELECTRONIC-AIDS; DEVICE; SATISFACTION; ADAPTATION; WHOQOL;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-018-1804-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Systematic review. The purpose of the study was to identify and organize evidence regarding quality of life influenced by assistive technology related to computers for people with traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Distrito Federal, Brazil. A search strategy was conducted on the PubMed, PEDro, LILACS, PsycINFO, and SCIELO. All types of study designs considering assistive technology to improve quality of life for individuals with SCI were included. After search strategy procedures, ten references were included to review. The methodologic quality of each study was evaluated using the Level of Evidence proposed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. Most of the studies showed that devices for computer access improve the quality of life of people with SCI, regardless of the level of injury and type of resource. However, the positive outcomes in the quality of life should be interpreted with caution, as several methodological limitations were observed in the articles. Despite the scarcity of studies and their methodological limitations, there is evidence that assistive technology for computer access favors the quality of life of people with tetraplegia due to SCI, since it improves participation, independence, and self-esteem.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 607
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   The relationship between quality of life and disability across the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury [J].
Barker, R. N. ;
Kendall, M. D. ;
Amsters, D. I. ;
Pershouse, K. J. ;
Haines, T. P. ;
Kuipers, P. .
SPINAL CORD, 2009, 47 (02) :149-155
[2]   Quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury: comparisons with other populations [J].
Boakye, Maxwell ;
Leigh, Barbara C. ;
Skelly, Andrea C. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2012, 17 :29-37
[3]   Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury [J].
Collinger, Jennifer L. ;
Boninger, Michael L. ;
Bruns, Tim M. ;
Curley, Kenneth ;
Wang, Wei ;
Weber, Douglas J. .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 50 (02) :145-159
[4]  
Cooper Rory A, 2010, Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, V21, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.pmr.2009.07.004
[5]  
Craig A, 2005, MED SCI MONITOR, V11, pRA32
[6]   Role of nursing in physical rehabilitation [J].
de Andrade, Leonardo Tadeu ;
de Araujo, Eduardo Gomes ;
Pimenta Andrade, Karla da Rocha ;
Soares, Debora Mendonca ;
Machado Cianca, Tania Couto .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2010, 63 (06) :1056-1060
[7]  
Alves ACD, 2017, DISABIL REHABIL-ASSI, V12, P160, DOI 10.1080/17483107.2016.1233294
[8]   Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement [J].
Des Jarlais, DC ;
Lyles, C ;
Crepaz, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 94 (03) :361-366
[9]   Application of the Portuguese version of the abbreviated instrument of quality life WHOQOL-bref [J].
Fleck, MPA ;
Louzada, S ;
Xavier, M ;
Chachamovich, E ;
Vieira, G ;
Santos, L ;
Pinzon, V .
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2000, 34 (02) :178-183
[10]  
Folan A., 2013, DISABILITY REHABILIT, V10, P46