The influence of salt stress on ABA and auxin concentrations in two maize cultivars differing in salt resistance

被引:107
|
作者
Zoerb, Christian [1 ]
Geilfus, Christoph-Martin [2 ]
Muehling, Karl H. [2 ]
Ludwig-Mueller, Jutta [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Inst Biol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Kiel, Inst Plant Nutr & Soil Sci, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Bot, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Maize; Salt stress; ABA; IBA; IAA; Auxin; Growth; ZEA-MAYS L; ABSCISIC-ACID; INDOLE-3-BUTYRIC ACID; 1ST PHASE; GROWTH; SALINITY; TOLERANCE; WHEAT; WATER; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jplph.2012.09.012
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The plant hormones abscisic acid (ABA) and auxin (IAA, IBA) play important roles in plant responses to environmental stresses such as salinity. Recent breeding improvements in terms of salt resistance of maize have lead to a genotype with improved growth under saline conditions. By comparing this salt-resistant hybrid with a sensitive hybrid, it was possible to show differences in hormone concentrations in expanding leaves and roots. In response to salinity, the salt-resistant maize significantly increased IBA concentrations in growing leaves and maintained IAA concentration in roots. These hormonal adaptations may help to establish favorable conditions for growth-promoting agents such as beta-expansins and maintain growth of resistant maize hybrids under salt stress. Moreover, ABA concentrations significantly increased in resistant maize leaves under salt stress, which may contribute to acidifying the apoplast, which in turn is a prerequisite for growth. (C) 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 224
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response of two tomato cultivars differing in salt tolerance to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress
    Al-Karaki, GN
    Hammad, R
    Rusan, M
    MYCORRHIZA, 2001, 11 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [2] Response of two tomato cultivars differing in salt tolerance to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress
    G. N. Al-Karaki
    R. Hammad
    M. Rusan
    Mycorrhiza, 2001, 11 : 43 - 47
  • [3] Salt-induced changes in two canola cultivars differing in salt tolerance
    Qasim, M
    Ashraf, M
    Ashraf, MY
    Rehman, SU
    Rha, ES
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2003, 46 (04) : 629 - 632
  • [4] Salt tolerance in two rice cultivars differing salt tolerant abilities in responses to iso-osmotic stress
    Cha-um, Suriyan
    Trakulyingcharoen, Thippawan
    Smitamana, Prasartporn
    Kirdmanee, Chalermpol
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE, 2009, 3 (04) : 221 - 230
  • [5] Physiological Characteristics and Alternative Respiratory Pathway under Salt Stress in Two Wheat Cultivars Differing in Salt Tolerance
    Y. Kong
    G. Zhou
    Y. Wang
    Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2001, 48 : 595 - 600
  • [6] Physiological characteristics and alternative respiratory pathway under salt stress in two wheat cultivars differing in salt tolerance
    Kong, Y
    Zhou, G
    Wang, Y
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 48 (05) : 595 - 600
  • [7] Photosynthesis in two wheat cultivars differing in salt susceptibility
    El-Shintinawy, F
    PHOTOSYNTHETICA, 2000, 38 (04) : 615 - 620
  • [8] Putrescine differently influences the effect of salt stress on polyamine metabolism and ethylene synthesis in rice cultivars differing in salt resistance
    Quinet, Muriel
    Ndayiragije, Alexis
    Lefevre, Isabelle
    Lambillotte, Beatrice
    Dupont-Gillain, Christine C.
    Lutts, Stanley
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2010, 61 (10) : 2719 - 2733
  • [9] INFLUENCE OF SALT STRESS ON PHOTORESPIRATORY ENZYMES IN LEGUMES DIFFERING IN SALT TOLERANCE
    MURUMKAR, CV
    RAJMANE, NA
    KARADGE, BA
    CHAVAN, PD
    PHOTOSYNTHETICA, 1985, 19 (02) : 244 - 246
  • [10] Differential Transcript Expression of Wall-loosening Candidates in Leaves of Maize Cultivars Differing in Salt Resistance
    Christoph-Martin Geilfus
    Christian Zörb
    Christina Neuhaus
    Tim Hansen
    Hartwig Lüthen
    Karl H. Mühling
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2011, 30 : 387 - 395