Design considerations for phase I/II dose finding clinical trials in Immuno-oncology and cell therapy

被引:11
作者
Liu, Rachael [1 ]
Lin, Jianchang [1 ]
Li, Pin [2 ]
机构
[1] Takeda Pharmaceur, Cambridge, MA USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Immuno-oncology; Dose finding design; Cell therapy; Bayesian non-parametric prior; Multiple populations; Seamless phase I/II; INTERVAL DESIGN; GENE-THERAPY; TOXICITY; PROBABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cct.2020.106083
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Immuno-oncology (I-O) and cell therapy, the frontier of cancer treatment, is a rapidly developing area that brings new opportunities to patients. In I-O and cell therapy clinical trial development, it is critical to identify the right dose level in early phase of trials thus improving the probability of success in confirmatory trials to test the superiority over other therapies. Given the complex mechanism interacting with immune system for I-O drugs especially cell therapy, the traditional oncology dose finding trial designs may not serve the purpose. Specifically, it is questionable to believe the monotone relationship between dose level and safety/efficacy, which will likely result in inappropriate dose selection using designs with monotone assumption. Additionally, considering the immune system pathway, designs ignoring the heterogeneity of the patient populations may provide misleading dose decisions, which could be either unsafe or lead to selection mistakes for targeted population. Therefore, in our paper, we review and present the limitations of the traditional dose finding designs. Then we discuss improved dose finding designs that consider both safety and efficacy outcomes simultaneously. Furthermore, we propose novel dose finding designs for multiple populations: BNP-mTPI and fBNP-mTPI, which extend the modified toxicity probability interval designs by utilizing Bayesian non-parametric priors. The proposed designs consider patient population differences meanwhile flexibly borrowing information across populations with similar profiles to improve the efficiency of dose search and accuracy of estimation of optimal dose level. Simulations are provided to demonstrate the model performance. Finally, we conclude the recommendations for I-O and cell therapy dose finding designs in the discussion and offer insights for future research direction.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Aldous David J., 1985, Lecture notes in mathematics, P1
[2]   Immuno-oncology-101: overview of major concepts and translational perspectives [J].
Allard, B. ;
Aspeslagh, S. ;
Garaud, S. ;
Dupont, F. A. ;
Solinas, C. ;
Kok, M. ;
Routy, B. ;
Sotiriou, C. ;
Stagg, J. ;
Buisseret, L. .
SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY, 2018, 52 :1-11
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, J BIOPHARM STAT, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.OMTO.2019.08.007
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, STAT MED, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-6617-7
[5]   Structure/function of human killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors: lessons from polymorphisms, evolution, crystal structures and mutations [J].
Campbell, Kerry S. ;
Purdy, Amanda K. .
IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 132 (03) :315-325
[6]   Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities [J].
Cheung, YK ;
Chappell, R .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (04) :1177-1182
[7]   How do CARs work? Early insights from recent clinical studies targeting CD19 [J].
Davila, Marco L. ;
Brentjens, Renier ;
Wang, Xiuyan ;
Riviere, Isabelle ;
Sadelain, Michel .
ONCOIMMUNOLOGY, 2012, 1 (09) :1577-1583
[8]  
FDA (Food and Drug Administration) . U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Pharmacology and Toxicology, 2015, GUID IND CONS DES EA
[9]   BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF SOME NONPARAMETRIC PROBLEMS [J].
FERGUSON, TS .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1973, 1 (02) :209-230
[10]   Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: 25 years in the making [J].
Gill, Saar ;
Maus, Marcela V. ;
Porter, David L. .
BLOOD REVIEWS, 2016, 30 (03) :157-167