How Does Integrated Reporting Change in Light of COVID-19? A Revisiting of the Content of the Integrated Reports

被引:47
作者
Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria [1 ]
Raimo, Nicola [2 ]
Marrone, Arcangelo [2 ]
Vitolla, Filippo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, Inst Multidisciplinar Empresa IME, Campus Miguel Unamuno, Salamanca 37008, Spain
[2] LUM Jean Monnet Univ, Dept Econ & Management, I-70010 Bari, Italy
关键词
integrated reporting; disclosure; COVID-19; legitimacy theory; LEGITIMACY;
D O I
10.3390/su12187605
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The crisis connected to the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic represents an epochal event destined to generate strong economic and social consequences. The impact of the pandemic on business activities and business models also entails rethinking reporting practices. The pandemic has, in fact, created an enormous need for investors and stakeholders in general for future-oriented information relating to the impacts of this event on organizations. Integrated reporting is an ideal tool to provide information related to the effects of the pandemic and provide a holistic view of the future prospects of organizations. This study, using legitimacy theory and based on a two-step methodology, highlighted a series of information that companies will need to have to include in integrated reports to maintain and defend legitimacy. The results provide a double perspective: the first based on content elements and the second based on capitals. The results represent an important guideline for companies for the preparation of future integrated reports.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1994, P CRIT PERSP ACC C N
  • [2] THE DOUBLE-EDGE OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMATION
    Ashforth, Blake E.
    Gibbs, Barrie W.
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1990, 1 (02) : 177 - 194
  • [3] The current status of greenhouse gas reporting by Chinese companies A test of legitimacy theory
    Chu, Choi Ieng
    Chatterjee, Bikram
    Brown, Alistair
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2012, 28 (02) : 114 - +
  • [4] Deegan C., 2002, ACCOUNTING AUDITING, V15, P282, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09513570210435852, 10.1108/09513570210435852]
  • [5] DOWLING J, 1975, PAC SOCIOL REV, V18, P122
  • [6] du Toit E, 2017, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V25, P654, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-03-2016-0052
  • [7] Fernando S., 2014, J THEORETICAL ACCOUN, V10, P149
  • [8] Guthrie J., 1990, Advances in public interest accounting, V3, P159
  • [9] International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), 2013, INT FRAM
  • [10] Symbolic or Behavioral Management? Corporate Reputation in High-Emission Industries
    Kim J.-N.
    Bach S.B.
    Clelland I.J.
    [J]. Corporate Reputation Review, 2007, 10 (2) : 77 - 98