Recommendation to develop strategies to increase the number of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients with timely access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention - The American Heart Association's Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Advisory Working Group

被引:141
作者
Jacobs, AK
Antman, EM
Ellrodt, G
Faxon, DP
Gregory, T
Mensah, GA
Moyer, P
Ornato, J
Peterson, ED
Sadwin, L
Smith, SC
机构
关键词
AHA Consensus Statements; myocardial infarction; revascularization; quality of health care; triage;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.174477
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Although evidence suggests that primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy in the majority of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), only a minority of patients with STEMI are treated with primary PCI, and of those, only a minority receive the treatment within the recommended 90 minutes after entry into the medical system. Market research conducted by the American Heart Association revealed that those involved in the care of patients with STEMI recognize the multiple barriers that prevent the prompt delivery of primary PCI and agree that it is necessary to develop systems or centers of care that will allow STEMI patients to benefit from primary PCI. The American Heart Association will convene a group of stakeholders (representing the interests of patients, physicians, emergency medical systems, community hospitals, tertiary hospitals, and payers) and quality-of-care and outcomes experts to identify the gaps between the existing and ideal delivery of care for STEMI patients, as well as the requisite policy implications. Working within a framework of guiding principles, the group will recommend strategies to increase the number of STEMI patients with timely access to primary PCI.
引用
收藏
页码:2152 / 2163
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]   Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction:: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) [J].
Eagle, KA ;
Goodman, SG ;
Avezum, A ;
Budaj, A ;
Sullivan, CM ;
López-Sendón, J .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9304) :373-377
[12]   An international perspective on acute coronary syndrome care: Insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [J].
Fox, KAA .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 148 (05) :S40-S45
[13]  
French WJ, 2000, AM J CARDIOL, V85, p5B
[14]   Has my patient achieved adequate myocardial reperfusion? [J].
Gibson, CM .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (05) :504-507
[15]   Design of a standardized system for transfer of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction for percutaneous coronary intervention [J].
Henry, TD ;
Unger, BT ;
Sharkey, SW ;
Lips, DL ;
Pedersen, WR ;
Madison, JD ;
Mooney, MR ;
Flygenring, BP ;
Larson, DM .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 150 (03) :373-384
[16]   Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction - Is it worth the wait? [J].
Jacobs, AK .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (08) :798-800
[17]   Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials [J].
Keeley, EC ;
Boura, JA ;
Grines, CL .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9351) :13-20
[18]   Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials [J].
Keeley, EC ;
Boura, JA ;
Grines, CL .
LANCET, 2006, 367 (9510) :579-588
[19]   Is primary angioplasty for some as good as primary angioplasty for all? Modeling across trials and individual patients [J].
Kent, DM ;
Schmid, CH ;
Lau, J ;
Selker, HP .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 17 (12) :887-894
[20]  
*LEAPFR GROUP, INC REW COMP GUID GL