Structured cost analysis of robotic TME resection for rectal cancer: a comparison between the da Vinci Si and Xi in a single surgeon's experience

被引:43
作者
Morelli, Luca [1 ,2 ]
Di Franco, Gregorio [1 ]
Lorenzoni, Valentina [3 ]
Guadagni, Simone [1 ]
Palmeri, Matteo [1 ]
Furbetta, Niccolo [1 ]
Gianardi, Desiree [1 ]
Bianchini, Matteo [1 ]
Caprili, Giovanni [1 ]
Mosca, Franco [2 ]
Turchetti, Giuseppe [3 ]
Cuschieri, Alfred [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Gen Surg, Dept Surg Translat & New Technol, Via Paradisa 2, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Pisa, EndoCAS Ctr Comp Assisted Surg, Pisa, Italy
[3] Scuola Super Sant Anna, Inst Management, Pisa, Italy
[4] Univ Dundee, Inst Med Sci & Technol, Dundee, Scotland
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2019年 / 33卷 / 06期
关键词
Robotic surgery; TME; Rectal cancer; Structured costs analysis; Da Vinci Xi; Da Vinci Si; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LEARNING-CURVE; OUTCOMES; CONVERSION; SAFETY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-018-6465-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundRobotic-assisted surgery by the da Vinci Si appears to benefit rectal cancer surgery in selected patients, but still has some limitations, one of which is its high costs. Preliminary studies have indicated that the use of the new da Vinci Xi provides some added advantages, but their impact on cost is unknown. The aim of the present study is to compare surgical outcomes and costs of rectal cancer resection by the two platforms, in a single surgeon's experience.MethodsFrom April 2010 to April 2017, 90 robotic rectal resections were performed, with either the da Vinci Si (Si-RobTME) or the da Vinci Xi (Xi-RobTME). Based on CUSUM analysis, two comparable groups of 40 consecutive Si-RobTME and 40 consecutive Xi-RobTME were obtained from the prospectively collected database and used for the present retrospective comparative study. Data costs were analysed based on the level of experience on the proficiency-gain curve (p-g curve) by the surgeon with each platform.ResultsIn both groups, two homogeneous phases of the p-g curve were identified: Si1 and Xi1: cases 1-19, Si2 and Xi2: cases 20-40. A significantly higher number of full RAS operations were achieved in the Xi-RobTME group (p<0.001). A statistically significant reduction in operating time (OT) during Si2 and Xi2 phase was observed (p<0.001), accompanied by reduced overall variable costs (OVC), personnel costs (PC) and consumable costs (CC) (p<0.001). All costs were lower in the Xi2 phase compared to Si2 phase: OT 265 versus 290min (p=0.052); OVC 7983 versus 10231.9 (p=0.009); PC 1151.6 versus 1260.2 (p=0.052), CC 3464.4 versus 3869.7 (p<0.001).ConclusionsOur experience confirms a significant reduction of costs with increasing surgeon's experience with both platforms. However, the economic gain was higher with the Xi with shorter OT, reduced PC and CC, in addition to a significantly larger number of cases performed by the fully robotic approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1858 / 1869
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Comparison of complication and conversion rates between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer: which patients and providers could benefit most from robotic-assisted surgery? [J].
Ackerman, Stacey J. ;
Daniel, Shoshana ;
Baik, Rebecca ;
Liu, Emelline ;
Mehendale, Shilpa ;
Tackett, Scott ;
Hellan, Minia .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 21 (03) :254-261
[2]   Robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched study [J].
Baek, Jeong-Heum ;
Pastor, Carlos ;
Pigazzi, Alessio .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (02) :521-525
[3]   Robotic versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Cost Analysis from A Single Institute in Korea [J].
Baek, Se-Jin ;
Kim, Seon-Hahn ;
Cho, Jae-Sung ;
Shin, Jae-Won ;
Kim, Jin .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (11) :2722-2729
[4]   Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes [J].
Bianchi, P. P. ;
Ceriani, C. ;
Locatelli, A. ;
Spinoglio, G. ;
Zampino, M. G. ;
Sonzogni, A. ;
Crosta, C. ;
Andreoni, B. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (11) :2888-2894
[5]   Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery [J].
Bokhari, Malak B. ;
Patel, Chirag B. ;
Ramos-Valadez, Diego I. ;
Ragupathi, Madhu ;
Haas, Eric M. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (03) :855-860
[6]   The role of robotics in colorectal surgery [J].
Cheng, Christina L. ;
Rezac, Craig .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 360
[7]   Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases [J].
D'Annibale, A ;
Morpurgo, E ;
Fiscon, V ;
Trevisan, P ;
Sovernigo, G ;
Orsini, C ;
Guidolin, D .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (12) :2162-2168
[8]   Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer [J].
D'Annibale, Annibale ;
Pernazza, Graziano ;
Monsellato, Igor ;
Pende, Vito ;
Lucandri, Giorgio ;
Mazzocchi, Paolo ;
Alfano, Giovanni .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (06) :1887-1895
[9]  
Delacroix Scott E Jr, 2010, Clin Colon Rectal Surg, V23, P119, DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1254299
[10]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213