Perspectives on Validation of High-Throughput Assays Supporting 21st Century Toxicity Testing

被引:103
作者
Judson, Richard [1 ]
Kavlock, Robert [1 ]
Martin, Matthew [1 ]
Reif, David [1 ]
Houck, Keith [1 ]
Knudsen, Thomas [1 ]
Richard, Ann [1 ]
Tice, Raymond R. [2 ]
Whelan, Maurice [3 ]
Xia, Menghang [4 ]
Huang, Ruili [4 ]
Austin, Christopher [4 ]
Daston, George [5 ]
Hartung, Thomas [6 ]
Fowle, John R., III
Wooge, William [7 ]
Tong, Weida [8 ]
Dix, David [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[2] NIEHS, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[3] Commiss European Communities, Joint Res Ctr, EURL ECVAM, I-21020 Ispra, Italy
[4] Natl Ctr Adv Translat Sci, Rockville, MD USA
[5] Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[8] US FDA, Jefferson, AR USA
关键词
validation; in vitro; high-throughput screening; APPLICABILITY DOMAIN; TOXICOLOGY; FRAMEWORK; THOUGHT; FOOD; RECOMMENDATIONS; INFORMATION; PRINCIPLES; RELEVANCE; BIOASSAYS;
D O I
10.14573/altex.2013.1.051
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
In vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays are seeing increasing use in toxicity testing. HTS assays can simultaneously test many chemicals but have seen limited use in the regulatory arena, in part because of the need to undergo rigorous, time-consuming formal validation. Here we discuss streamlining the validation process, specifically for prioritization applications. By prioritization, we mean a process in which less complex, less expensive, and faster assays are used to prioritize which chemicals are subjected first to more complex, expensive, and slower guideline assays. Data from the HTS prioritization assays is intended to provide a priori evidence that certain chemicals have the potential to lead to the types of adverse effects that the guideline tests are assessing. The need for such prioritization approaches is driven by the fact that there are tens of thousands of chemicals to which people are exposed, but the yearly throughput of most guideline assays is small in comparison. The streamlined validation process would continue to ensure the reliability and relevance of assays for this application. We discuss the following practical guidelines: (1) follow current validation practice to the extent possible and practical; (2) make increased use of reference compounds to better demonstrate assay reliability and relevance; (3) de-emphasize the need for cross-laboratory testing; and (4) implement a web-based, transparent, and expedited peer review process.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 66
页数:16
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] ADVERSE OUTCOME PATHWAYS: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK TO SUPPORT ECOTOXICOLOGY RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT
    Ankley, Gerald T.
    Bennett, Richard S.
    Erickson, Russell J.
    Hoff, Dale J.
    Hornung, Michael W.
    Johnson, Rodney D.
    Mount, David R.
    Nichols, John W.
    Russom, Christine L.
    Schmieder, Patricia K.
    Serrrano, Jose A.
    Tietge, Joseph E.
    Villeneuve, Daniel L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2010, 29 (03) : 730 - 741
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, OECD SERIES TESTING, V129
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, Toxicity testing in the 21st century : a vision and a strategy
  • [4] A specific mechanism for nonspecific activation in reporter-gene assays
    Auld, Douglas S.
    Thorne, Natasha
    Nguyen, Dac-Trung
    Inglese, James
    [J]. ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2008, 3 (08) : 463 - 470
  • [5] Ballatori Nazzareno, 2003, Environmental Health Perspectives, V111, P61
  • [6] Chemical target and pathway toxicity mechanisms defined in primary human cell systems
    Berg, Ellen L.
    Yang, Jian
    Melrose, Jennifer
    Nguyen, Dat
    Privat, Sylvie
    Rosler, Elen
    Kunkel, Eric J.
    Ekins, Sean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS, 2010, 61 (01) : 3 - 15
  • [7] Safety Testing: Moving Toward Alternative Methods
    Birnbaum, Linda S.
    Stokes, William S.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 118 (01) : A12 - A13
  • [8] IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a noncancer mode of action for humans
    Boobis, Alan R.
    Doe, John E.
    Heinrich-Hirsch, Barbara
    Meek, M. E.
    Munn, Sharon
    Ruchirawat, Mathuros
    Schlatter, Josef
    Seed, Jennifer
    Vickers, Carolyn
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2008, 38 (02) : 87 - 96
  • [9] Automation of an in vitro cytotoxicity assay used to estimate starting doses in acute oral systemic toxicity tests
    Bouhifd, Mounir
    Bories, Gilles
    Casado, Juan
    Coecke, Sandra
    Norlen, Hedvig
    Parissis, Nicholaos
    Rodrigues, Robim M.
    Whelan, Maurice P.
    [J]. FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2012, 50 (06) : 2084 - 2096
  • [10] Meeting the scientific needs of ecological risk assessment in a regulatory context
    Bradbury, SP
    Feijtel, TCJ
    Van Leeuwen, CJ
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (23) : 463A - 470A