Perceived Experiences of Atheist Discrimination: Instrument Development and Evaluation

被引:31
作者
Brewster, Melanie E. [1 ]
Hammer, Joseph [2 ]
Sawyer, Jacob S. [1 ]
Eklund, Austin [1 ]
Palamar, Joseph [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Teachers Coll, Dept Counseling & Clin Psychol, 525 West 120th St,Box 102, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Educ Sch & Counseling Psychol, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[3] NYU, Langone Med Center, Dept Populat Hlth, New York, NY 10003 USA
关键词
atheism; scale development; discrimination; minority stress; nonbelief; stigma; COLLECTIVE SELF-ESTEEM; MENTAL-HEALTH; BRIEF GUIDE; STIGMA; CONSEQUENCES; IDENTITY; STRESS; ISSUES; SCALE; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1037/cou0000156
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The present 2 studies describe the development and initial psychometric evaluation of a new instrument, the Measure of Atheist Discrimination Experiences (MADE), which may be used to examine the minority stress experiences of atheist people. Items were created from prior literature, revised by a panel of expert researchers, and assessed psychometrically. In Study 1 (N = 1,341 atheist-identified people), an exploratory factor analysis with 665 participants suggested the presence of 5 related dimensions of perceived discrimination. However, bifactor modeling via confirmatory factor analysis and model-based reliability estimates with data from the remaining 676 participants affirmed the presence of a strong "general" factor of discrimination and mixed to poor support for substantive subdimensions. In Study 2 (N = 1,057 atheist-identified people), another confirmatory factor analysis and model-based reliability estimates strongly supported the bifactor model from Study 1 (i.e., 1 strong "general" discrimination factor) and poor support for subdimensions. Across both studies, the MADE general factor score demonstrated evidence of good reliability (i.e., Cronbach's alphas of .94 and .95; omega hierarchical coefficients of .90 and .92), convergent validity (i.e., with stigma consciousness, beta = .56; with awareness of public devaluation, beta = .37), and preliminary evidence for concurrent validity (i.e., with loneliness beta = .18; with psychological distress beta = .27). Reliability and validity evidence for the MADE subscale scores was not sufficient to warrant future use of the subscales. Limitations and implications for future research and clinical work with atheist individuals are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 570
页数:14
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: A meta-analysis [J].
Ano, GG ;
Vasconcelles, EB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 61 (04) :461-480
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, America's Changing Religious Landscape, P3
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ASIAN POPULATION 201
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, US SOCIALIST PRESIDE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, AM FEEL REL GROUPS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, RAISING FREETHINKERS
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Test Theory A Unified Treat
[9]  
Arcaro Tom., 2010, Skeptic Magazine, V15, P50
[10]  
Arel D., 2015, PARENTING GOD