Leadership for team learning: the case of university teacher teams

被引:40
作者
Koeslag-Kreunen, Mieke G. M. [1 ,2 ]
Van der Klink, Marcel R. [1 ]
Van den Bossche, Piet [2 ,3 ]
Gijselaers, Wim H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Zuyd Univ Appl Sci, Res Ctr Educ Innovat & CPD, POB 550, NL-6400 AN Heerlen, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Educ Res & Dev, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Antwerp, Fac Social Sci, Sint Jacobstr 2, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Team learning; Team leadership; Shared leadership; Higher education; Teacher teams; Task perception; HIGHER-EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS; SHARED LEADERSHIP; MANAGEMENT TEAMS; PERFORMANCE; TASK; KNOWLEDGE; NETWORKS; COLLABORATION; COMMUNITIES; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10734-017-0126-0
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Teacher team involvement is considered a key factor in achieving sustainable innovation in higher education. This requires engaging in team learning behaviors that should result in new knowledge and solutions. However, university teachers are not used to discussing their work practices with one another and tend to neglect any innovation in their tasks. Team leadership behavior is often considered essential for stimulating team learning behavior, but it is unclear how this transpires. Therefore, the present study explores university teacher team members' perceptions of team learning behavior, their assigned task, and leadership behaviors in their team. Interviews were conducted with 16 members of different teacher teams at a university of applied sciences. Findings included that the vast majority of the team learning behaviors only involved sharing ideas; engaging in constructive conflicts and co-constructions was not observed. Only a few teams combined all three team learning behaviors. In these teams, members observed that existing methods and solutions were no longer adequate, with leaders appearing to combine transformational and transactional behaviors, but operating from a distance without actively interfering in the process. Furthermore, these team members shared leadership behaviors while focusing on the team as a whole, instead of solving problems at individual level. This strongly indicates that task perception and specific vertical and shared team leadership behaviors play a role in stimulating teachers in seeking controversy and co-constructing new knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 207
页数:17
相关论文
共 69 条
[11]   What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite [J].
Cohen, SG ;
Bailey, DE .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1997, 23 (03) :239-290
[12]   Team capability beliefs over time: Distinguishing between team potency, team outcome efficacy, and team process efficacy [J].
Collins, Catherine G. ;
Parker, Sharon K. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 83 (04) :1003-1023
[13]  
Cooke N.J., 2001, International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, V5, P297, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0503_10
[14]  
Cox M. D., 2004, New Dir. Teach. Learn, V2004, P5, DOI [DOI 10.1002/TL.129, 10.1002/tl.129]
[15]  
Crow GM, 2000, EDUC ADMIN QUART, V36, P216, DOI 10.1177/0013161X00362004
[16]   Leadership capacity in teams [J].
Day, DV ;
Gronn, P ;
Salas, E .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2004, 15 (06) :857-880
[17]   Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis [J].
De Dreu, CKW ;
Weingart, LR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (04) :741-749
[18]   Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations [J].
Decuyper, Stefan ;
Dochy, Filip ;
Van den Bossche, Piet .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2010, 5 (02) :111-133
[19]  
Denzin N. K., 2018, The Sage handbook of qualitative research: sage
[20]   A review and integration of classification systems relevant to teams in organizations [J].
Devine, DJ .
GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2002, 6 (04) :291-310