Using mixture design and neural networks to build stock selection decision support systems

被引:27
|
作者
Liu, Yi-Cheng [1 ]
Yeh, I-Cheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Tamkang Univ, Dept Int Business, 151 Yingzhuan Rd, New Taipei 25137, Taiwan
[2] Tamkang Univ, Dept Civil Engn, 151 Yingzhuan Rd, New Taipei 25137, Taiwan
关键词
Neural networks; Design of experiments; Multifactor; Weighted scoring; Stock selection; RETURNS; INFORMATION; PREDICTION; WINNERS; GROWTH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s00521-015-2090-x
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
There are three disadvantages of weighted scoring stock selection models. First, they cannot identify the relations between weights of stock-picking concepts and performances of portfolios. Second, they cannot systematically discover the optimal combination for weights of concepts to optimize the performances. Third, they are unable to meet various investors' preferences. This study aimed to more efficiently construct weighted scoring stock selection models to overcome these disadvantages. Since the weights of stock-picking concepts in a weighted scoring stock selection model can be regarded as components in a mixture, we used the simplex-centroid mixture design to obtain the experimental sets of weights. These sets of weights are simulated with US stock market historical data to obtain their performances. Performance prediction models were built with the simulated performance data set and artificial neural networks. Furthermore, the optimization models to reflect investors' preferences were built up, and the performance prediction models were employed as the kernel of the optimization models, so that the optimal solutions can now be solved with optimization techniques. The empirical values of the performances of the optimal weighting combinations generated by the optimization models showed that they can meet various investors' preferences and outperform those of S&P's 500 not only during the training period but also during the testing period.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 535
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experiments with neural networks as a design-support tool for complex engineering systems
    Goh, ATC
    CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 1995, 12 (04): : 327 - 342
  • [22] NEURAL NETWORKS FOR DECISION-SUPPORT - PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES
    SCHOCKEN, S
    ARIAV, G
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 1994, 11 (05) : 393 - 414
  • [23] A comparative study of forecasting corporate credit ratings using neural networks, support vector machines, and decision trees
    Golbayani, Parisa
    Florescu, Ionut
    Chatterjee, Rupak
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 54
  • [24] Predicting Emerging and Frontier Stock Markets Using Deep Neural Networks
    Murekachiro, Dennis
    Mokoteli, Thabang
    Vadapalli, Hima
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, VOL 1, 2020, 1037 : 899 - 918
  • [25] Model selection for medical diagnosis decision support systems
    Mangiameli, P
    West, D
    Rampal, R
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2004, 36 (03) : 247 - 259
  • [26] Evaluation of inherent performance of intelligent medical decision support systems: utilising neural networks as an example
    Smith, AE
    Nugent, CD
    McClean, SI
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 27 (01) : 1 - 27
  • [27] Short-Term Transit Decision Support System Using Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks
    Sun, Fangzhou
    Dubey, Abhishek
    Samal, Chinmaya
    Baroud, Hiba
    Kulkarni, Chetan S.
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART COMPUTING (SMARTCOMP 2018), 2018, : 155 - 162
  • [28] Portfolio selection using neural networks
    Fernandez, Alberto
    Gomez, Sergio
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2007, 34 (04) : 1177 - 1191
  • [29] Relational Fusion-based Stock Selection with Neural Recursive Ordinary Differential Equation Networks
    Gao, Qiang
    Zhou, Xinzhu
    Huang, Li
    Zhang, Kunpeng
    Liu, Siyuan
    Zhou, Fan
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2024, 110
  • [30] A novel approach based on Neural Networks and Support Vector Machine for stock price pattern discovery
    Fan Yajing
    Gan Yujian
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG KNOWLEDGE (IEEE ICBK 2017), 2017, : 259 - 263