Patient Preferences for Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography versus Conventional Catheter Angiography for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease

被引:6
作者
Sadigh, Gelareh [1 ]
Carlos, Ruth C. [2 ]
Kazerooni, Ella A. [3 ]
Kelly, Aine M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Radiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Div Magnet Resonance, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Div Cardiothorac Imaging, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Coronary artery disease; coronary CT angiography; catheter coronary angiography; patient preferences; utility assessment; health utility; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; PROCESS UTILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2013.05.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: The aims of the study were: 1) to assess the baseline health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) using the standard gamble; 2) to evaluate-and compare patients' preference for catheter versus computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using the Wait tradeoff (WTO) and rating scales; and 3) to calculate test disutility for catheter and CT coronary angiography. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with CAD who underwent both CT and catheter angiography were interviewed by telephone within 6 months of testing. Patients were asked about their baseline symptoms and quality of life, their experience preparing for both CT and catheter angiography, their desire to undergo CT or catheter angiography, and immediate treatment versus having a waiting period between test results and treatment for a hypothetical "ideal test" with no side effects. Test disutility for CT and catheter angiography were calculated and compared. Results: The mean and median baseline HRQOL utility values were 0.72 and 0.91. The patients were willing to wait a mean (median) time of 12 (3) days after the ideal test for the test results to avoid undergoing CT angiography. They were willing to wait a mean (median) of 7 (3) days after the ideal test for test results, to avoid undergoing catheter angiography. There was no significant difference between waiting times or between patients' rating for their experience preparing for the two tests. Test disutility for CT angiography was 1.30 quality-adjusted life days (QALD) versus 2.16 QALD for catheter angiography (P > .05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in patient preference and test disutility between CT and catheter angiography in our small series. Future rigorously planned and adequately powered studies are required to confirm these findings in larger patient populations.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1098
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Achenbach Stephan, 2003, Cardiology Clinics, V21, P549, DOI 10.1016/S0733-8651(03)00090-0
  • [2] [Anonymous], HLTH TECHNOL ASSESS
  • [3] A review of health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cardiovascular disease
    Dyer, Matthew T. D.
    Goldsmith, Kimberley A.
    Sharples, Linda S.
    Buxton, Martin J.
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2010, 8
  • [4] METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING HEALTH-STATE PREFERENCES .2. SCALING METHODS
    FROBERG, DG
    KANE, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 42 (05) : 459 - 471
  • [5] Gold M.R., 1996, Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine, P176
  • [6] Cost effectiveness of clinically appropriate decisions on alternative treatments for angina pectoris: prospective observational study
    Griffin, S. C.
    Barber, J. A.
    Manca, A.
    Sculpher, M. J.
    Thompson, S. G.
    Buxton, M. J.
    Hemingway, H.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7594): : 624 - 628
  • [7] Health-related quality of life with coronary heart disease prevention and treatment
    Lalonde, L
    Clarke, AE
    Joseph, L
    Mackenzie, T
    Grover, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (10) : 1011 - 1018
  • [8] Paper standard gamble: The reliability of a paper questionnaire to assess utility
    Littenberg, B
    Partilo, S
    Licata, A
    Kattan, MW
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (06) : 480 - 488
  • [9] Morimoto Takeshi, 2002, J Epidemiol, V12, P160
  • [10] A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of suspected coronary artery disease
    Paech, Daniel C.
    Weston, Adele R.
    [J]. BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2011, 11