Are we counting what counts? A closer look at environmental concern, pro-environmental behaviour, and carbon footprint

被引:98
作者
Kennedy, Emily Huddart [1 ]
Krahn, Harvey [2 ]
Krogman, Naomi T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Resource Econ & Environm Sociol, 515 Gen Serv Bldg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Sociol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
carbon footprint; pro-environmental behaviour; environmental concern; environmental impact; VALUES; ATTITUDES; POLICY; US; CONSUMPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; AFFLUENCE; IMPACT; BASES;
D O I
10.1080/13549839.2013.837039
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Three parallel lines of inquiry regarding individuals' support for the environment have developed within the environmental social sciences. These include individuals' concern for the environment, research on private sphere pro-environmental behaviour (PEB), i.e. household actions seeking to improve the environment (e.g. buying better light bulbs), and more recently, ecological and carbon footprints. Researchers have noted that the correlates of this third form of support for the environment are not necessarily the same as the predictors of the first two forms. Using Canadian survey data, this study examines the relationships among, and predictors of, all three forms. Evidence that there is not a link between private sphere PEB and household carbon footprints, and that measures of socio-economic status (education and income) have different effects on different types of support for the environment, invites a discussion of whether environmental social scientists are really counting what counts.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 236
页数:17
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households' direct and indirect energy use and savings? [J].
Abrahamse, Wokje ;
Steg, Linda .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 30 (05) :711-720
[2]  
Anderson M.W., 2012, ENCY SUSTAINABILITY, P260
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CAN J PROGRAM EVAL
[4]  
BONDS E, 2010, CRITICAL SOCIOLOGY, V37, P429
[5]  
Cock PH, 2002, Psychology of Sustainable Development Partnerships for Sustainability: Psychology for Ecology, P175
[6]  
Csutora M, 2012, J CONSUM POLICY, V35, P145, DOI 10.1007/s10603-012-9187-8
[7]   The use of material flow analysis and the ecological footprint in regional policy-making: application and insights from Northern Ireland [J].
Curry, Robin ;
Maguire, Cathy ;
Simmons, Craig ;
Lewis, Kevin .
LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 16 (02) :165-179
[8]   Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century [J].
Curtin, R ;
Presser, S ;
Singer, E .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2005, 69 (01) :87-98
[9]   Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern [J].
Dietz, T ;
Stern, PC ;
Guagnano, GA .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1998, 30 (04) :450-471
[10]   Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences [J].
Dietz, Thomas ;
Dan, Amy ;
Shwom, Rachael .
RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2007, 72 (02) :185-214