Outcome of Immediate Versus Early Antibiotics in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:46
作者
Rothrock, Steven G. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Cassidy, David D. [2 ,3 ]
Barneck, Mitchell [2 ,3 ]
Schinkel, Michiel [5 ,6 ]
Guetschow, Brian [2 ,3 ]
Myburgh, Christiaan [2 ,3 ]
Nguyen, Linh [4 ]
Earwood, Ryan [4 ]
Nanayakkara, Prabath W. B. [5 ]
Panday, Rishi S. Nannan [5 ]
Briscoe, Joshua G. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Dr P Phillips Hosp, Orlando Hlth, Dept Emergency Med, Orlando, FL 32819 USA
[2] Orlando Hlth, Dept Emergency Med, Orlando Reg Med Ctr, Orlando, FL USA
[3] Orlando Hlth, Residency Emergency Med, Orlando, FL 32806 USA
[4] Florida State Univ, Coll Med, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Internal Med,Sect Acute Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr, Acad Med Ctr, Amsterdam UMC, Ctr Expt & Mol Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
SURVIVING SEPSIS; MORTALITY; QUALITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; DEFINITIONS; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; TIME; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.04.042
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Debate exists about the mortality benefit of administering antibiotics within either 1 or 3 hours of sepsis onset. We performed this meta-analysis to analyze the effect of immediate (0 to 1 hour after onset) versus early (1 to 3 hours after onset) antibiotics on mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Methods: This review was consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Searched databases included PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, as well as gray literature. Included studies were conducted with consecutive adults with severe sepsis or septic shock who received antibiotics within each period and provided mortality data. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers and pooled with random effects. Two authors independently assessed quality of evidence across all studies with Cochrane's Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology and risk of bias within each study, using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Thirteen studies were included: 5 prospective longitudinal and 8 retrospective cohort ones. Three studies (23%) had a high risk of bias (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). Overall, quality of evidence across all studies (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was low. Pooling of data (33,863 subjects) showed no difference in mortality between patients receiving antibiotics in immediate versus early periods (odds ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.21). Analysis of severe sepsis studies (8,595 subjects) found higher mortality in immediate versus early periods (odds ratio 1.29; 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.53). Conclusion: We found no difference in mortality between immediate and early antibiotics across all patients. Although the quality of evidence across studies was low, these findings do not support a mortality benefit for immediate compared with early antibiotics across all patients with sepsis.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 441
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Prehospital antibiotics in the ambulance for sepsis: a multicentre, open label, randomised trial [J].
Alam, Nadia ;
Oskam, Erick ;
Stassen, Patricia M. ;
van Exter, Pieternel ;
van de Ven, Peter M. ;
Haak, Harm R. ;
Holleman, Frits ;
van Zanten, Arthur ;
van Leeuwen-Nguyen, Hien ;
Bon, Victor ;
Duineveld, Bart A. M. ;
Panday, Rishi S. Nannan ;
Kramer, Mark H. H. ;
Nanayakkara, Prabath W. B. .
LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (01) :40-50
[2]   World Health Organization recommendations are often strong based on low confidence in effect estimates [J].
Alexander, Paul E. ;
Bero, Lisa ;
Montori, Victor M. ;
Brito, Juan Pablo ;
Stoltzfus, Rebecca ;
Djulbegovic, Benjamin ;
Neumann, Ignacio ;
Rave, Supriya ;
Guyatt, Gordon .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (06) :629-634
[3]  
American Academy of Emergency Medicine, STATEMENT SURVIVING
[4]  
American College of Emergency Physicians, ACEP STATEMENT SSC H
[5]   Impact of compliance with infection management guidelines on outcome in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational multi-center study [J].
Bloos, Frank ;
Thomas-Ruddel, Daniel ;
Rueddel, Hendrik ;
Engel, Christoph ;
Schwarzkopf, Daniel ;
Marshall, John C. ;
Harbarth, Stephan ;
Simon, Philipp ;
Riessen, Reimer ;
Keh, Didier ;
Dey, Karin ;
Weiss, Manfred ;
Toussaint, Susanne ;
Schaedler, Dirk ;
Weyland, Andreas ;
Ragaller, Maximillian ;
Schwarzkopf, Konrad ;
Eiche, Juergen ;
Kuhnle, Gerhard ;
Hoyer, Heike ;
Hartog, Christiane ;
Kaisers, Udo ;
Reinhart, Konrad .
CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (02)
[6]   Corticosteroids for acute bacterial meningitis [J].
Brouwer, Matthijs C. ;
McIntyre, Peter ;
Prasad, Kameshwar ;
van de Beek, Diederik .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (06)
[7]   Antimicrobial agent prescription: a prospective cohort study in patients with sepsis and septic shock [J].
Castano, Pablo ;
Plaza, Maribel ;
Molina, Fernando ;
Hincapie, Carolina ;
Maya, Wilmar ;
Catano, Juan ;
Gonzalez, Javier ;
Leon, Alba ;
Jaimes, Fabian .
TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2019, 24 (02) :175-184
[8]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2020, NQF ENDORSED VOLUNTA
[9]   Evaluation of community-acquired sepsis by PIRO system in the emergency department [J].
Chen, Yun-Xia ;
Li, Chun-Sheng .
INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 8 (06) :521-527
[10]   The association between time to antibiotics and relevant clinical outcomes in emergency department patients with various stages of sepsis: a prospective multi-center study [J].
de Groot, Bas ;
Ansems, Annemieke ;
Gerling, Daan H. ;
Rijpsma, Douwe ;
van Amstel, Paul ;
Linzel, Durk ;
Kostense, Piet J. ;
Jonker, Marianne ;
de Jonge, Evert .
CRITICAL CARE, 2015, 19