Efficacy of Coupling Inhibitory and Facilitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Enhance Motor Recovery in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients

被引:135
作者
Sung, Wen-Hsu [1 ]
Wang, Chih-Pin [2 ]
Chou, Chen-Liang [4 ]
Chen, Yi-Cheng [4 ]
Chang, Yue-Cune [3 ]
Tsai, Po-Yi [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Dept Phys Therapy & Assist Technol, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[3] Tamkang Univ, Dept Math, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
facilitatory repetitive magnetic stimulation; inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; motor function; stroke; treatment; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; CORTEX; RTMS; PERFORMANCE; PLASTICITY; SAFETY; TRIAL; HAND;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000522
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-Although there has been extensive research on the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to improve patients' motor performance after experiencing chronic stroke, explicit findings on the coupling of different rTMS protocols are meager. We designed this sham-controlled randomized study to investigate the potential for a consecutive suppressive-facilitatory TMS protocol to improve motor outcomes after chronic stroke. Methods-Fifty-four chronic hemiplegic stroke patients were allocated across 4 groups to undergo 20 daily sessions of (1) 1 Hz rTMS over the contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) and then intermittent theta burst stimulation over the ipsilesional M1 (group A); (2) contralesional sham stimulation and then ipsilesional real intermittent theta burst stimulation (group B); (3) contralesional real 1 Hz rTMS and then ipsilesional sham stimulation (group C); or (4) bilateral sham-control procedures (group D). We tested cortical excitability and motor activity assessments at the baseline, postpriming rTMS, and postconsequent rTMS periods. Results-At post, group A showed greater muscle strength, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Wolf Motor Function test, and reaction time improvement in comparison with group B (P<0.001 approximate to 0.003) and group C (P=0.001 approximate to 0.003). Correlation analyses in group A revealed a close relation between contralesional map area decrement and Wolf Motor Function test gain (P=0.005; r=-0.75), and also revealed ipsilesional map area increment and reaction time decrement (P=0.02; r=-0.87). We detected no such relations in the other 3 groups. Conclusions-Our clinical trials established an extended timeframe during which conditioning could be safely continued and produced more favorable outcomes in facilitating motor performance and ameliorating interhemispheric imbalance than those obtained from single-course rTMS modulation alone. (Stroke. 2013;44:1375-1382.)
引用
收藏
页码:1375 / 1382
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]   Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research [J].
Rossi, Simone ;
Hallett, Mark ;
Rossini, Paolo M. ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro ;
Avanzini, Giuliano ;
Bestmann, Sven ;
Berardelli, Alfredo ;
Brewer, Carmen ;
Canli, Turhan ;
Cantello, Roberto ;
Chen, Robert ;
Classen, Joseph ;
Demitrack, Mark ;
Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo ;
Epstein, Charles M. ;
George, Mark S. ;
Fregni, Felipe ;
Ilmoniemi, Risto ;
Jalinous, Reza ;
Karp, Barbara ;
Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal ;
Lisanby, Sarah ;
Meunier, Sabine ;
Miniussi, Carlo ;
Miranda, Pedro ;
Padberg, Frank ;
Paulus, Walter ;
Peterchev, Angel ;
Porteri, Corinna ;
Provost, Miriam ;
Quartarone, Angelo ;
Rotenberg, Alexander ;
Rothwell, John ;
Ruohonen, Jarmo ;
Siebner, Hartwig ;
Thut, Gregor ;
Valls-Sole, Josep ;
Walsh, Vincent ;
Ugawa, Yoshikatzu ;
Zangen, Abraham ;
Ziemann, Ulf .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 120 (12) :2008-2039
[32]   NONINVASIVE ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF THE BRAIN, SPINAL-CORD AND ROOTS - BASIC PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES FOR ROUTINE CLINICAL-APPLICATION - REPORT OF AN IFCN COMMITTEE [J].
ROSSINI, PM ;
BARKER, AT ;
BERARDELLI, A ;
CARAMIA, MD ;
CARUSO, G ;
CRACCO, RQ ;
DIMITRIJEVIC, MR ;
HALLETT, M ;
KATAYAMA, Y ;
LUCKING, CH ;
DENOORDHOUT, ALM ;
MARSDEN, CD ;
MURRAY, NMF ;
ROTHWELL, JC ;
SWASH, M ;
TOMBERG, C .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 91 (02) :79-92
[33]   Inhibition of the unaffected motor cortex by 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances motor performance and training effect of the paretic hand in patients with chronic stroke [J].
Takeuchi, Naoyuki ;
Tada, Takeo ;
Toshima, Masahiko ;
Chuma, Takayo ;
Matsuo, Yuichiro ;
Ikoma, Katsunori .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2008, 40 (04) :298-303
[34]   Priming theta-burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with low- and high-frequency stimulation [J].
Todd, Gabrielle ;
Flavel, Stanley C. ;
Ridding, Michael C. .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2009, 195 (02) :307-315
[35]   Follow-up of interhemispheric differences of motor evoked potentials from the 'affected' and 'unaffected' hemispheres in human stroke [J].
Traversa, R ;
Cicinelli, P ;
Pasqualetti, P ;
Filippi, M ;
Rossini, PM .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 803 (1-2) :1-8
[36]  
Valiulis V, 2012, ACTA NEUROBIOL EXP, V72, P283, DOI 10.55782/ane-2012-1901
[37]   Correlation between cortical plasticity, motor learning and BDNF genotype in healthy subjects [J].
Voti, P. Li ;
Conte, A. ;
Suppa, A. ;
Iezzi, E. ;
Bologna, M. ;
Aniello, M. S. ;
Defazio, G. ;
Rothwell, J. C. ;
Berardelli, Alfredo .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2011, 212 (01) :91-99
[38]   Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the international workshop on the safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, June 5-7, 1996 [J].
Wassermann, EM .
EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 108 (01) :1-16
[39]   The EXCITE trial: Attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke [J].
Wolf, SL ;
Thompson, PA ;
Morris, DA ;
Rose, DK ;
Winstein, CJ ;
Taub, E ;
Giuliani, C ;
Pearson, SL .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2005, 19 (03) :194-205