Efficacy of Coupling Inhibitory and Facilitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Enhance Motor Recovery in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients

被引:135
作者
Sung, Wen-Hsu [1 ]
Wang, Chih-Pin [2 ]
Chou, Chen-Liang [4 ]
Chen, Yi-Cheng [4 ]
Chang, Yue-Cune [3 ]
Tsai, Po-Yi [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Dept Phys Therapy & Assist Technol, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[3] Tamkang Univ, Dept Math, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
facilitatory repetitive magnetic stimulation; inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; motor function; stroke; treatment; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; CORTEX; RTMS; PERFORMANCE; PLASTICITY; SAFETY; TRIAL; HAND;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000522
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-Although there has been extensive research on the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to improve patients' motor performance after experiencing chronic stroke, explicit findings on the coupling of different rTMS protocols are meager. We designed this sham-controlled randomized study to investigate the potential for a consecutive suppressive-facilitatory TMS protocol to improve motor outcomes after chronic stroke. Methods-Fifty-four chronic hemiplegic stroke patients were allocated across 4 groups to undergo 20 daily sessions of (1) 1 Hz rTMS over the contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) and then intermittent theta burst stimulation over the ipsilesional M1 (group A); (2) contralesional sham stimulation and then ipsilesional real intermittent theta burst stimulation (group B); (3) contralesional real 1 Hz rTMS and then ipsilesional sham stimulation (group C); or (4) bilateral sham-control procedures (group D). We tested cortical excitability and motor activity assessments at the baseline, postpriming rTMS, and postconsequent rTMS periods. Results-At post, group A showed greater muscle strength, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Wolf Motor Function test, and reaction time improvement in comparison with group B (P<0.001 approximate to 0.003) and group C (P=0.001 approximate to 0.003). Correlation analyses in group A revealed a close relation between contralesional map area decrement and Wolf Motor Function test gain (P=0.005; r=-0.75), and also revealed ipsilesional map area increment and reaction time decrement (P=0.02; r=-0.87). We detected no such relations in the other 3 groups. Conclusions-Our clinical trials established an extended timeframe during which conditioning could be safely continued and produced more favorable outcomes in facilitating motor performance and ameliorating interhemispheric imbalance than those obtained from single-course rTMS modulation alone. (Stroke. 2013;44:1375-1382.)
引用
收藏
页码:1375 / 1382
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Low-frequency rTMS promotes use-dependent motor plasticity in chronic stroke A randomized trial [J].
Avenanti, A. ;
Coccia, M. ;
Ladavas, E. ;
Provinciali, L. ;
Ceravolo, M. G. .
NEUROLOGY, 2012, 78 (04) :256-264
[2]   One-hertz subthreshold rTMS increases the threshold for evoking inhibition in the human motor cortex [J].
Bagnato, S ;
Currá, A ;
Modugno, N ;
Gilio, F ;
Quartarone, A ;
Rizzo, V ;
Girlanda, P ;
Inghilleri, M ;
Berardelli, A .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 160 (03) :368-374
[3]   Neuronavigation Increases the Physiologic and Behavioral Effects of Low-Frequency rTMS of Primary Motor Cortex in Healthy Subjects [J].
Bashir, S. ;
Edwards, D. ;
Pascual-Leone, A. .
BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2011, 24 (01) :54-64
[4]   Safety study of 50 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease [J].
Benninger, David H. ;
Lomarev, Mikhail ;
Wassermann, Eric M. ;
Lopez, Grisel ;
Houdayer, Elise ;
Fasano, Rebecca E. ;
Dang, Nguyet ;
Hallett, Mark .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 120 (04) :809-815
[5]   Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Disrupting Neural Activity to Alter and Assess Brain Function [J].
Bolognini, Nadia ;
Ro, Tony .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 30 (29) :9647-9650
[6]  
Boutros NN, 2000, DEPRESS ANXIETY, V12, P166, DOI 10.1002/1520-6394(2000)12:3<166::AID-DA8>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-M
[8]   Effects of Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Brain Polarization on Performance of a Motor Sequence Task After Chronic Stroke [J].
Celnik, Pablo ;
Paik, Nam-Jong ;
Vandermeeren, Yves ;
Dimyan, Michael ;
Cohen, Leonardo G. .
STROKE, 2009, 40 (05) :1764-1771
[9]   Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Motor Cortex after Stroke A Focused Review [J].
Corti, Manuela ;
Patten, Carolynn ;
Triggs, William .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2012, 91 (03) :254-270
[10]   Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications [J].
Cramer, Steven C. ;
Sur, Mriganka ;
Dobkin, Bruce H. ;
O'Brien, Charles ;
Sanger, Terence D. ;
Trojanowski, John Q. ;
Rumsey, Judith M. ;
Hicks, Ramona ;
Cameron, Judy ;
Chen, Daofen ;
Chen, Wen G. ;
Cohen, Leonardo G. ;
deCharms, Christopher ;
Duffy, Charles J. ;
Eden, Guinevere F. ;
Fetz, Eberhard E. ;
Filart, Rosemarie ;
Freund, Michelle ;
Grant, Steven J. ;
Haber, Suzanne ;
Kalivas, Peter W. ;
Kolb, Bryan ;
Kramer, Arthur F. ;
Lynch, Minda ;
Mayberg, Helen S. ;
McQuillen, Patrick S. ;
Nitkin, Ralph ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro ;
Reuter-Lorenz, Patricia ;
Schiff, Nicholas ;
Sharma, Anu ;
Shekim, Lana ;
Stryker, Michael ;
Sullivan, Edith V. ;
Vinogradov, Sophia .
BRAIN, 2011, 134 :1591-1609