GFDL's CM2 global coupled climate models. Part IV: Idealized climate response

被引:104
作者
Stouffer, RJ
Broccoli, AJ
Delworth, TL
Dixon, KW
Gudgel, R
Held, I
Hemler, R
Knutson, T
Lee, HC
Schwarzkopf, MD
Soden, B
Spelman, MJ
Winton, M
Zeng, F
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ 08542 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Environm Sci, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
[3] RS Informat Serv, Mclean, VA USA
[4] Univ Miami, Miami, FL 33152 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1175/JCLI3632.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The climate response to idealized changes in the atmospheric CO2 concentration by the new GFDL climate model (CM2) is documented. This new model is very different from earlier GFDL models in its parameterizations of subgrid-scale physical processes, numerical algorithms, and resolution. The model was constructed to be useful for both seasonal-to-interannual predictions and climate change research. Unlike previous versions of the global coupled GFDL climate models, CM2 does not use flux adjustments to maintain a stable control climate. Results from two model versions, Climate Model versions 2.0 (CM2.0) and 2.1 (CM2.1), are presented. Two atmosphere-mixed layer ocean or slab models, Slab Model versions 2.0 (SM2.0) and 2.1 (SM2.1), are constructed corresponding to CM2.0 and CM2.1. Using the SM2 models to estimate the climate sensitivity, it is found that the equilibrium globally averaged surface air temperature increases 2.9 (SM2.0) and 3.4 K (SM2.1) for a doubling of the atmospheric CO2 Concentration. When forced by a 1% per year CO2 increase, the surface air temperature difference around the time of CO2 doubling [transient climate response (TCR)] is about 1.6 K for both coupled model versions (CM2.0 and CM2.1). The simulated warming is near the median of the responses documented for the climate models used in the 2001 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group I Third Assessment Report (TAR). The thermohaline circulation (THC) weakened in response to increasing atmospheric CO2. By the time of CO2 doubling, the weakening in CM2.1 is larger than that found in CM2.0: 7 and 4 Sv (1 Sv equivalent to 10(6) m(3) s(-1)), respectively. However, the THC in the control integration of CM2.1 is stronger than in CM2.0, so that the percentage change in the THC between the two versions is more similar. The average THC change for the models presented in the TAR is about 3 or 4 Sv; however, the range across the model results is very large, varying from a slight increase (+2 Sv) to a large decrease (-10 Sv).
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 740
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] The new GFDL global atmosphere and land model AM2-LM2: Evaluation with prescribed SST simulations
    Anderson, JL
    Balaji, V
    Broccoli, AJ
    Cooke, WF
    Delworth, TL
    Dixon, KW
    Donner, LJ
    Dunne, KA
    Freidenreich, SM
    Garner, ST
    Gudgel, RG
    Gordon, CT
    Held, IM
    Hemler, RS
    Horowitz, LW
    Klein, SA
    Knutson, TR
    Kushner, PJ
    Langenhost, AR
    Lau, NC
    Liang, Z
    Malyshev, SL
    Milly, PCD
    Nath, MJ
    Ploshay, JJ
    Ramaswamy, V
    Schwarzkopf, MD
    Shevliakova, E
    Sirutis, JJ
    Soden, BJ
    Stern, WF
    Thompson, LA
    Wilson, RJ
    Wittenberg, AT
    Wyman, BL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2004, 17 (24) : 4641 - 4673
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1989, CLIM DYNAM
  • [3] Cubasch U., 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001, P526
  • [4] Review of simulations of climate variability and change with the GFDL R30 coupled climate model
    Delworth, TL
    Stouffer, RJ
    Dixon, KW
    Spelman, MJ
    Knutson, TR
    Broccoli, AJ
    Kushner, PJ
    Wetherald, RT
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2002, 19 (07) : 555 - 574
  • [5] GFDL's CM2 global coupled climate models. Part I: Formulation and simulation characteristics
    Delworth, TL
    Broccoli, AJ
    Rosati, A
    Stouffer, RJ
    Balaji, V
    Beesley, JA
    Cooke, WF
    Dixon, KW
    Dunne, J
    Dunne, KA
    Durachta, JW
    Findell, KL
    Ginoux, P
    Gnanadesikan, A
    Gordon, CT
    Griffies, SM
    Gudgel, R
    Harrison, MJ
    Held, IM
    Hemler, RS
    Horowitz, LW
    Klein, SA
    Knutson, TR
    Kushner, PJ
    Langenhorst, AR
    Lee, HC
    Lin, SJ
    Lu, J
    Malyshev, SL
    Milly, PCD
    Ramaswamy, V
    Russell, J
    Schwarzkopf, MD
    Shevliakova, E
    Sirutis, JJ
    Spelman, MJ
    Stern, WF
    Winton, M
    Wittenberg, AT
    Wyman, B
    Zeng, F
    Zhang, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (05) : 643 - 674
  • [6] A comparison of climate change simulations produced by two GFDL coupled climate models
    Dixon, KW
    Delworth, TL
    Knutson, TR
    Spelman, MJ
    Stouffer, RJ
    [J]. GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2003, 37 (1-2) : 81 - 102
  • [7] The influence of transient surface fluxes on North Atlantic overturning in a coupled GCM climate change experiment
    Dixon, KW
    Delworth, TL
    Spelman, MJ
    Stouffer, RJ
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1999, 26 (17) : 2749 - 2752
  • [8] The Arctic and Antarctic oscillations and their projected changes under global warming
    Fyfe, JC
    Boer, GJ
    Flato, GM
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1999, 26 (11) : 1601 - 1604
  • [9] GFDL's CM2 global coupled climate models. Part II: The baseline ocean simulation
    Gnanadesikan, A
    Dixon, KW
    Griffies, SM
    Balaji, V
    Barreiro, M
    Beesley, JA
    Cooke, WF
    Delworth, TL
    Gerdes, R
    Harrison, MJ
    Held, IM
    Hurlin, WJ
    Lee, HC
    Liang, Z
    Nong, G
    Pacanowski, RC
    Rosati, A
    Russell, J
    Samuels, BL
    Song, Q
    Spelman, MJ
    Stouffer, RJ
    Sweeney, CO
    Vecchi, G
    Winton, M
    Wittenberg, AT
    Zeng, F
    Zhang, R
    Dunne, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (05) : 675 - 697
  • [10] The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments
    Gordon, C
    Cooper, C
    Senior, CA
    Banks, H
    Gregory, JM
    Johns, TC
    Mitchell, JFB
    Wood, RA
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2000, 16 (2-3) : 147 - 168