Clinical Predictors of EMG-confirmed Cervical and Lumbosacral Radiculopathy

被引:7
作者
Hassan, Ali [1 ]
Hameed, Bilal [1 ]
Islam, Muhammad [1 ]
Khealani, Bhojo [1 ]
Khan, Mustafa [1 ]
Shafqat, Saad [1 ]
机构
[1] Aga Khan Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, Neurol Sect, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
关键词
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1017/S0317167100013767
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Electromyography (EMG) for suspected cervical or lumbosacral root compression is often negative, producing expense and physical discomfort that could have been avoided. To improve patient selection for testing, we sought to identify clinical features that would accurately predict presence of radiculopathy on EMG. Methods: Adult patients consecutively evaluated for suspected cervical or lumbosacral root compression at an academic clinical neurophysiology laboratory were prospectively enrolled. Presence of clinical features suggesting root disease (neck or back pain, dermatomal pain or numbness, myotomal weakness, segmental reflex loss, and straight leg-raising) was recorded prior to testing. EMG examination to confirm root compression was conducted per standard protocols. Analysis was based on computation of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy. Results: A total of 200 patients (55% male; mean age 46.4 years; 38% suspected of cervical and 62% of lumbosacral disease) were included. EMG evidence of root disease was detected in 31% of cervical and 62% of lumbosacral referrals. Dermatomal pain was the most sensitive, and segmental reflex loss and myotomal weakness the most specific individual predictors of root disease. Combined presence of dermatomal pain or numbness with segmental reflex loss and myotomal weakness approached specificities of 78% (lumbosacral disease) and 99% (cervical disease). In all cases, myotomal weakness was the most accurate predictor of root disease. Conclusion: The diverse symptoms and signs of cervical and lumbosacral root compression predict a positive electrodiagnosis of radiculopathy with varying degrees of accuracy, and may be used to guide patient selection for EMG testing.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 224
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   The value of neurophysiological and imaging studies in predicting outcome in the surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy [J].
Alrawi, Mogdad F. ;
Khalil, Nofal M. ;
Mitchell, Piers ;
Hughes, Sean P. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 16 (04) :495-500
[2]  
American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, 1999, Muscle Nerve Suppl, V8, pS209
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, REV ESP SALUD PUBLIC
[4]   UTILITY OF ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC TESTING IN EVALUATING PATIENTS WITH LUMBOSACRAL RADICULOPATHY: AN EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEW [J].
Cho, S. Charles ;
Ferrante, Mark A. ;
Levin, Kerry H. ;
Harmon, Robert L. ;
So, Yuen T. .
MUSCLE & NERVE, 2010, 42 (02) :276-282
[5]   Diagnostic value of history, physical examination and needle electromyography in diagnosing lumbosacral radiculopathy [J].
Coster, Suzan ;
de Bruijn, Sebastiaan F. T. M. ;
Tavy, Denes L. J. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2010, 257 (03) :332-337
[6]   How to get the most out of nerve conduction studies and electromyography [J].
Fuller, G .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 76 :41-46
[7]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF THE LUMBAR SPINE IN PEOPLE WITHOUT BACK PAIN [J].
JENSEN, MC ;
BRANTZAWADZKI, MN ;
OBUCHOWSKI, N ;
MODIC, MT ;
MALKASIAN, D ;
ROSS, JS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (02) :69-73
[8]  
Lauder Tamara D, 2002, Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, V13, P451, DOI 10.1016/S1047-9651(02)00006-2
[9]   Predicting electrodiagnostic outcome in patients with upper limb symptoms: Are the history and physical examination helpful? [J].
Lauder, TD ;
Dillingham, TR ;
Andary, M ;
Kumar, S ;
Pezzin, LE ;
Stephens, RT ;
Shannon, S .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (04) :436-441
[10]   Effect of history and exam in predicting electrodiagnostic outcome among patients with suspected lumbosacral radiculopathy [J].
Lauder, TD ;
Dillingham, TR ;
Andary, M ;
Kumar, S ;
Pezzin, LE ;
Stephens, MRT ;
Shannon, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2000, 79 (01) :60-68