Comparison of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline and fentanyl, 0.75% ropivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine for extension of epidural analgesia for urgent caesarean section after low dose epidural infusion during labour

被引:9
作者
Sng, B. L. [1 ]
Pay, L. L. [1 ]
Sia, A. T. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Womens Anaesthesia, Singapore 229899, Singapore
关键词
epidural anaesthesia; obstetric anaesthesia; local anaesthesic; lignocaine; ropivacaine; levobupivacaine;
D O I
10.1177/0310057X0803600505
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Low dose local anaesthetic and fentanyl epidural solutions are commonly 'topped-up' for urgent caesarean section. However; the block characteristics associated with newer local anaesthetics such as ropivacaine 0.75% and levobupivacaine 0.5% have not been fully determined. In a randomised double-blinded controlled clinical trial, we compared 2% lignocaine with adrenaline and fentanyl (LAF), 0.75% ropivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine for extension of low dose epidural analgesia for urgent caesarean section in 90 Asian parturients. There was no significant difference in the median, interquartile range, time to T4 loss of sensation to cold between LAF (9.5, 7.0 to 13.3 minutes), 0.75% ropivacaine (10.0, 7.0 to 15.0 minutes) and 0.5% levobupivacaine (10.0, 7.0 to 15.0 minutes). No woman required conversion to general anaesthesia. The supplementation rate did not differ between groups. Levobupivacaine provided a longer duration of sensory block compared to LAF, but a similar duration to 0.75% ropivacaine. Under the conditions of this study there was no significant difference in time to surgical readiness (defined as loss of sensation to cold to T4) between LAF, 0.75% ropivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine groups. Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine are suitable alternatives for extending epidural analgesia for urgent caesarean section.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 664
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Levobuplvacaine in obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia. Wheve is its place?
    Bremerich, DH
    Zwissler, B
    [J]. ANAESTHESIST, 2004, 53 (07): : 637 - +
  • [2] Cacciapuoti A, 2002, Minerva Anestesiol, V68, P599
  • [3] Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different?
    Casati, Andrea
    Putzu, Marta
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (02) : 247 - 268
  • [4] Enrolling decisionally impaired adults in clinical research
    Chen, DT
    Miller, FG
    Rosenstein, DL
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (09) : 20 - 29
  • [5] CROSSLEY AWA, 1994, ANAESTHESIA, V49, P205
  • [6] CLINICAL EFFECTS AND MATERNAL AND FETAL PLASMA-CONCENTRATION OF EPIDURAL ROPIVACAINE VERSUS BUPIVACAINE FOR CESAREAN-SECTION
    DATTA, S
    CAMANN, W
    BADER, A
    VANDERBURGH, L
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (06) : 1346 - 1352
  • [7] DICKSON MAS, 1994, ANAESTHESIA, V49, P636
  • [8] The comparative toxicity of ropivacaine and bupivacaine at equipotent doses in rats
    Dony, P
    Dewinde, V
    Vanderick, B
    Cuignet, O
    Gautier, P
    Legrand, E
    Lavand'homme, P
    De Kock, M
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (06) : 1489 - 1492
  • [9] A comparison of levobupivacaine 0.5% and racemic bupivacaine 0.5% for extradural anesthesia for caesarean section
    Faccenda, KA
    Simpson, AM
    Henderson, DJ
    Smith, D
    McGrady, EM
    Morrison, LMM
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2003, 28 (05) : 394 - 400
  • [10] A comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl and 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl for continuous epidural labor analgesia
    Fernandez-Guisasola, J
    Serrano, ML
    Cobo, B
    Muñoz, L
    Plaza, A
    Trigo, C
    del Valle, SG
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (05) : 1261 - 1265