Coping with uncertainty in water management: Qualitative system analysis as a vehicle to visualize the plurality of practitioners' uncertainty handling routines

被引:13
作者
Hoellermann, Britta [1 ]
Evers, Mariele [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Dept Geog, Meckenheimer Allee 166, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
关键词
Uncertainty handling; Water management; Science-practice gap; Decision-making; Expert elicitation; Qualitative system analysis; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INFORMATION; ADAPTATION; FRAMEWORK; IGNORANCE; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.034
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accelerated environmental and societal change and its dynamic present a challenge for water management, making it increasingly relevant to integrate uncertainties into the decision-making process. The challenge to science informing practice is how to provide scientific uncertainty information in a way that this information becomes usable for practitioners. We know that practitioners have developed routines in order to cope with uncertainties, but in order to facilitate the transfer of uncertainty information, this study analyses by whom, when and where in the decision-making process uncertainty routines are used. This research contributes to the plurality of practitioners' perspectives on decision-making under uncertainty in water management. Based on expert elicitation we show that, depending on the business unit and on the time horizon of the management object, practitioners are using different uncertainty routines and hence are in need of more tailor-made uncertainty information to inform their decision-making. Our qualitative systems modeling approach highlighting a reservoir management example serves as a boundary object visualizing the intersection of uncertainty routines and fostering cross-communication and acknowledgement of different perspectives among practitioners. It thus provides a platform for learning. Moreover, it provides a clear understanding of the uncertainty information needs which scientists may cover and increases the usability of their research findings, closing the science-practice gap in adaptive management and transformation processes.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 223
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [11] 2-D
  • [12] Coyle RG., 1996, SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODE
  • [13] Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments
    Dee, Laura E.
    Allesina, Stefano
    Bonn, Aletta
    Eklof, Anna
    Gaines, Steven D.
    Hines, Jes
    Jacob, Ute
    McDonald-Madden, Eve
    Possingham, Hugh
    Schroeter, Matthias
    Thompson, Ross M.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 32 (02) : 118 - 130
  • [14] How to embrace uncertainty in participatory climate change risk management-A roadmap
    Doell, Petra
    Romero-Lankao, Patricia
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2017, 5 (01) : 18 - 36
  • [15] Using a Cognitive Mapping Approach to Frame the Perceptions of Water Users About Managing Water Resources: A Case Study in the Australian Capital Territory
    ElSawah, Sondoss
    Mclucas, Alan
    Mazanov, Jason
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2013, 27 (09) : 3441 - 3456
  • [16] Fazey I, 2005, ECOL SOC, V10
  • [17] SCIENCE FOR THE POST-NORMAL AGE
    FUNTOWICZ, SO
    RAVETZ, JR
    [J]. FUTURES, 1993, 25 (07) : 739 - 755
  • [18] Towards adaptive and integrated management paradigms to meet the challenges of water governance
    Halbe, J.
    Pahl-Wostl, C.
    Sendzimir, J.
    Adamowski, J.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 67 (11) : 2651 - 2660
  • [19] A framework for engaging stakeholders in water quality modeling and management: Application to the Qu'Appelle River Basin, Canada
    Hassanzadeh, Elmira
    Strickert, Graham
    Morales-Marin, Luis
    Noble, Bram
    Baulch, Helen
    Shupena-Soulodre, Etienne
    Lindenschmidt, Karl-Erich
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 231 : 1117 - 1126
  • [20] Integration of uncertainties in water and flood risk management
    Hoellermann, B.
    Evers, M.
    [J]. CHANGES IN FLOOD RISK AND PERCEPTION IN CATCHMENTS AND CITIES, 2015, 370 : 193 - 199