Economic uncertainty and corruption: evidence from a large cross-country data set

被引:28
|
作者
Goel, Rajeev K. [1 ]
Ram, Rati [1 ]
机构
[1] Illinois State Univ, Dept Econ, Normal, IL 61790 USA
关键词
corruption; uncertainty; government; quantile regression; transition economies;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2012.714073
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A vast amount of research has considered numerous causes and correlates of corruption. Also, there have been many studies of the consequences of various forms of uncertainty. However, exploration of the nexus between economic uncertainty and corruption appears scarce. After providing an intuitive and heuristic linkage between general economic uncertainty and corruption, this article uses a large cross-country data set to augment a fairly standard model with simple proxies for uncertainty and to investigate how economic uncertainty might affect the prevalence of corruption. In addition, a quantile-regression framework is used to judge how the strength of various covariates may differ with the level of corruption. Seven main points emerge from the estimates. First, economic uncertainty is associated positively with corruption, and the relation seems to be robust across measures of uncertainty and corruption. Second, quantile-regression estimates indicate considerable parametric heterogeneity across the distribution of corruption. Third, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita has the expected corruption-mitigating role. Fourth, increased political rights and civil liberties also appear to lower corruption. Fifth, greater government consumption is associated with lower corruption. Sixth, while the hyperinflation dummy lacks significance in most OLS regressions, its significance varies across the distribution of corruption. Seventh, neither police force nor government subsidies shows significance, but transition economies have more corruption.
引用
收藏
页码:3462 / 3468
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Cross-Country Comparison of Corruption and Public Expenditures: A Panel Data Approach
    Sevuktekin, Mustafa
    Nargelecekenler, Mehmet
    Giray, Filiz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2010, 33 (03) : 140 - 150
  • [22] GLOBAL ECONOMIC SANCTIONS, GLOBAL BANK LINKAGES AND INFORMATION ASYMMETRY: AN EVIDENCE FROM CROSS-COUNTRY DATA
    Le Thanh Ha
    Hoang Phuong Dung
    Pham Hong Chuong
    To Trung Thanh
    Tran Thi Lan Huong
    GLOBAL ECONOMY JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (03)
  • [23] The interaction effect of economic freedom and democracy on corruption: A panel cross-country analysis
    Saha, Shrabani
    Gounder, Rukmani
    Su, Jen-Je
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2009, 105 (02) : 173 - 176
  • [24] Corruption: A cross-country comparison of contagion and conformism
    Schram, Arthur
    Zheng, Jin Di
    Zhuravleva, Tatyana
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2022, 193 : 497 - 518
  • [25] Tax policy, corruption, and formal business entry: Cross-country evidence from emerging economies
    Bilan, Irina
    Apostoaie, Constantin-Marius
    ECONOMIC CHANGE AND RESTRUCTURING, 2025, 58 (02)
  • [26] Corruption and public debt: a cross-country analysis
    Benfratello, Luigi
    Del Monte, Alfredo
    Pennacchio, Luca
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 25 (05) : 340 - 344
  • [27] Tourism competitiveness and corruption: a cross-country analysis
    Das, Jayoti
    Dirienzo, Cassandra
    TOURISM ECONOMICS, 2010, 16 (03) : 477 - 492
  • [28] Economic uncertainty and corruption: Evidence from public and private firms
    Afzali, Mansoor
    Colak, Gonul
    Fu, Mengchuan
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2021, 57
  • [29] Cultural Dimension of Corruption: A Cross-Country Survey
    Achim M.V.
    International Advances in Economic Research, 2016, 22 (3) : 333 - 345
  • [30] Corruption and auditor choice: a cross-country investigation
    Duh, Rong-Ruey
    Ye, Chunlai
    Yu, Lin-Hui
    REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2020, 19 (02) : 175 - 197