Modified Model for Diagnosing Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 to 5 Breast Lesions Retrospective Analysis and Nomogram Development

被引:3
作者
Zhou, Peng [1 ]
Jin, Chunchun [1 ]
Lu, Jianghao [1 ]
Xu, Lifeng [1 ]
Zhu, Xiaomin [1 ]
Lian, Qingshu [1 ]
Gong, Xuehao [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp 2, Dept Ultrasound,Affiliated Hosp 1, Shenzhen 518035, Peoples R China
关键词
breast; Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System; diagnosis; nomogram; ultrasound; CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND; ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; BENIGN; RISK; CARCINOMAS; US;
D O I
10.1002/jum.15385
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to explore a modified model to simplify the diagnostic process for American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 to 5 breast lesions and evaluate the model's diagnostic efficacy. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of breast lesions examined by B-mode ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and diagnosed by histopathologic examination from October 2016 to August 2019. The US characteristics of a combined model (US + CEUS model) with relatively high diagnostic value were selected by a lasso regression analysis to establish a modified model. Two nomograms were developed. The results were internally validated by bootstrap resampling. Results Overall, 206 breast lesions in 198 patients, 136 benign and 70 malignant, were included. Ultrasound characteristics included in the modified model were shape, margin, microcalcification, enhanced intensity, enhanced scope, and enhanced time. For the US + CEUS model and modified model, sensitivities were 94.3% and 93.3%; specificities were 85.9% and 81.4%; accuracies were 89.3% and 88.7% and areas under the curve were 0.957 and 0.944, respectively. No statistically significant differences were seen in the diagnostic efficacies of the models (P= .097). Bootstrap-corrected sensitivities, specificities. and accuracies of the models were consistent with these results. Bootstrap-corrected areas under the curve for the US + CEUS model and the modified model were 0.955 and 0.940, respectively. Conclusions The modified model with fewer indicators conveniently and effectively diagnosed the malignancy of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 to 5 breast lesions without reducing diagnostic efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 161
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Predictive Value of Clinicopathological Characteristics for Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Breast Cancer [J].
Ding, Jinhua ;
Jiang, Li ;
Wu, Weizhu .
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2017, 23 :4102-4108
[2]   The Clinical Significance of Real-Time Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Differential Diagnosis of Breast Tumor [J].
Du Wenhua ;
Liu Lijia ;
Wang Hui ;
You Wei ;
Tao Li .
CELL BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2012, 63 (02) :117-120
[3]   Homogeneously enhancing breast lesions on contrast enhanced US: differential diagnosis by conventional and contrast enhanced US findings [J].
Fujimitsu, Ritsuko ;
Shimakura, Mikiko ;
Urakawa, Hiroshi ;
Morita, Ayako ;
Shinagawa, Yoshinobu ;
Sakamoto, Keiko ;
Yoshimitsu, Kengo .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 34 (07) :508-514
[4]   Nomogram for Predicting Risk of Intestinal Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery [J].
Jiang, Hui-hong ;
Dong, Xian-long ;
Tang, Xuan ;
Li, A-jian ;
Chang, Yi ;
Li, Hua-guang ;
Chen, Ying ;
Zhang, Zhi-yong ;
Tang, Er-jiang ;
Lin, Mou-bin .
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2019, 25 :2104-2111
[5]   Quantitative Multiparametric Breast Ultrasound Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Elastography Leads to an Improved Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions [J].
Kapetas, Panagiotis ;
Clauser, Paola ;
Woitek, Ramona ;
Wengert, Georg J. ;
Lazar, Mathias ;
Pinker, Katja ;
Helbich, Thomas H. ;
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2019, 54 (05) :257-264
[6]   Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Breast Masses: Adjunct Tool to Decrease the Number of False-Positive Biopsy Results [J].
Lee, Sandy C. ;
Tchelepi, Hisham ;
Grant, Edward ;
Desai, Bhushan ;
Luo, Chunqiao ;
Groshen, Susan ;
Hovanessian-Larsen, Linda .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (09) :2259-2273
[7]   Nomogram for Preoperative Estimation of Microvascular Invasion Risk in Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within the Milan Criteria [J].
Lei, Zhengqing ;
Li, Jun ;
Wu, Dong ;
Xia, Yong ;
Wang, Qing ;
Si, Anfeng ;
Wang, Kui ;
Wan, Xuying ;
Lau, Wan Yee ;
Wu, Mengchao ;
Shen, Feng .
JAMA SURGERY, 2016, 151 (04) :356-363
[8]   Can different regions of interest influence the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced sonography? [J].
Li, Jing ;
Guo, Liping ;
Yin, Li ;
Fang, Hong ;
Ye, Wenxiu ;
Zhao, Bingyu ;
Liu, Yue ;
Xu, Tong .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 108 :1-6
[9]   Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Sub-1-cm Breast Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Sonography [J].
Liu, He ;
Jiang, Yuxin ;
Dai, Qing ;
Zhu, Qingli ;
Wang, Liang ;
Zhang, Jing ;
Yang, Qian .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (01) :117-123
[10]   Comparative Study of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis for Identifying Benign and Malignant Breast Tumor Lumps [J].
Liu, Jian ;
Gao, Yun-Hua ;
Li, Ding-Dong ;
Gao, Yan-Chun ;
Hou, Ling-Mi ;
Xie, Ting .
ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (19) :8149-8153