Photolysis frequency measurement techniques: results of a comparison within the ACCENT project

被引:73
作者
Bohn, B. [1 ]
Corlett, G. K. [2 ]
Gillmann, M. [3 ]
Sanghavi, S. [3 ]
Stange, G. [4 ]
Tensing, E. [4 ]
Vrekoussis, M. [5 ]
Bloss, W. J. [6 ]
Clapp, L. J. [7 ]
Kortner, M. [8 ]
Dorn, H. -P. [1 ]
Monks, P. S. [2 ]
Platt, U. [3 ]
Plass-Dulmer, C. [4 ]
Mihalopoulos, N. [5 ]
Heard, D. E. [6 ]
Clemitshaw, K. C. [7 ]
Meixner, F. X. [8 ]
Prevot, A. S. H. [9 ]
Schmitt, R. [10 ]
机构
[1] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Chem & Dynam Geosphare 2 Troposphare, D-52425 Julich, Germany
[2] Univ Leicester, Dept Chem, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Umweltphys, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Meteorol Observ Hohenpeissenberg, D-82383 Hohenpeissenberg, Germany
[5] Univ Crete, Environm Chem Lab, Iraklion 71003, Greece
[6] Univ Leeds, Sch Chem, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Imperial Coll London, Dept Environm Sci & Technol, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[8] Max Planck Inst Chem, Biogeochem Dept, D-55128 Mainz, Germany
[9] Paul Scherrer Inst, Lab Atmospher Chem, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
[10] Meteorol Consult GmbH Metcon, D-61462 Konigstein, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.5194/acp-8-5373-2008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An intercomparison of different radiometric techniques measuring atmospheric photolysis frequencies j(NO2), j(HCHO) and j((OD)-D-1) was carried out in a two-week field campaign in June 2005 at Julich. Germany. Three double-monochromator based spectroradiometers (DM-SR), three single-monochromator based spectroradiometers with diode-array detectors (SM-SR) and seventeen filter radiometers (FR) (ten j(NO2))-FR, seven j((OD)-D-1)-FR) took part in this comparison. For j(NO2), all spectroradiometer results agreed within +/- 3%. For j(HCHO), agreement was slightly poorer between -8% and +4% of the DM-SR reference result. For the SM-SR deviations were explained by poorer spectral resolutions and lower accuracies caused by decreased sensitivities of the photodiode arrays in a wave-length range below 350 nm. For j((OD)-D-1), the results were more complex within +8% and -4% with increasing deviations towards larger solar zenith angles for the SM-SR. The direction and the magnitude of the deviations were dependent on the technique of background determination. All j(NO2))-FR showed good linearity with sing-le calibration factors being sufficient to convert from output voltages to j(NO2)). Measurements were feasible until sunset and comparison with previous calibrations showed good long-term stability. For the j((OD)-D-1)-FR, conversion from output voltages to j((OD)-D-1) needed calibration factors and correction functions considering the influences of total ozone column and elevation of the sun. All instruments showed good linearity at photolysis frequencies exceeding about 10% of maximum values. At larger solar zenith angles, the agreement was non-uniform with deviations explainable by insufficient correction functions. Comparison with previous calibrations for sonic J((OD)-D-1)-FR indicated drifts of calibration factors.
引用
收藏
页码:5373 / 5391
页数:19
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry:: Volume I -: gas phase reactions of Ox, HOx, NOx and SOx species [J].
Atkinson, R ;
Baulch, DL ;
Cox, RA ;
Crowley, JN ;
Hampson, RF ;
Hynes, RG ;
Jenkin, ME ;
Rossi, MJ ;
Troe, J .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2004, 4 :1461-1738
[2]   International Photolysis Frequency Measurement and Model Intercomparison (IPMMI): Spectral actinic solar flux measurements and modeling [J].
Bais, AF ;
Madronich, S ;
Crawford, J ;
Hall, SR ;
Mayer, B ;
van Weele, M ;
Lenoble, J ;
Calvert, JG ;
Cantrell, CA ;
Shetter, RE ;
Hofzumahaus, A ;
Koepke, P ;
Monks, PS ;
Frost, G ;
McKenzie, R ;
Krotkov, N ;
Kylling, A ;
Swartz, WH ;
Lloyd, S ;
Pfister, G ;
Martin, TJ ;
Roeth, EP ;
Griffioen, E ;
Ruggaber, A ;
Krol, M ;
Kraus, A ;
Edwards, GD ;
Mueller, M ;
Lefer, BL ;
Johnston, P ;
Schwander, H ;
Flittner, D ;
Gardiner, BG ;
Barrick, J ;
Schmitt, R .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D16)
[3]   Measurement of atmospheric O3→O(1D) photolysis frequencies using filterradiometry -: art. no. D10S90 [J].
Bohn, B ;
Kraus, A ;
Müller, M ;
Hofzumahaus, A .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2004, 109 (D10) :D105901-11
[4]   Model-aided radiometric determination of photolysis frequencies in a sunlit atmosphere simulation chamber [J].
Bohn, B ;
Zilken, H .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2005, 5 :191-206
[5]   Overview and conclusions of the international photolysis frequency measurement and modeling intercomparison (IPMMI) study [J].
Cantrell, CA ;
Calvert, JG ;
Bais, A ;
Shetter, RE ;
Lefer, BL ;
Edwards, GD .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D16)
[6]   A review of instrumentation and measurement techniques for ground-based and airborne field studies of gas-phase tropospheric chemistry [J].
Clemitshaw, KC .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 34 (01) :1-108
[7]   A new actinic flux 4π-spectroradiometer:: instrument design and application to clear sky and broken cloud conditions [J].
Eckstein, E ;
Perner, D ;
Brühl, C ;
Trautmann, T .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2003, 3 :1965-1979
[8]   Performance of a single-monochromator diode array spectroradiometer for the determination of actinic flux and atmospheric photolysis frequencies [J].
Edwards, GD ;
Monks, PS .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D16)
[9]   Photooxidation of trace gases in the troposphere [J].
Ehhalt, DH .
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 1 (24) :5401-5408
[10]  
Grant RH, 1997, J APPL METEOROL, V36, P1336, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1336:OOSRDF>2.0.CO