Informing Evidence-Based Decision-Making for Patients with Comorbidity: Availability of Necessary Information in Clinical Trials for Chronic Diseases

被引:87
|
作者
Boyd, Cynthia M. [1 ]
Vollenweider, Daniela [2 ]
Puhan, Milo A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Geriatr Med & Gerontol, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 08期
关键词
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA; INDIVIDUAL PATIENTS; COMPETING RISKS; SELF-MANAGEMENT; HEART-FAILURE; PREVALENCE; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; CARE; MULTIMORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0041601
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: The population with multiple chronic conditions is growing. Prior studies indicate that patients with comorbidities are frequently excluded from trials but do not address whether information is available in trials to draw conclusions about treatment effects for these patients. Methods and Findings: We conducted a literature survey of trials from 11 Cochrane Reviews for four chronic diseases (diabetes, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and stroke). The Cochrane Reviews systematically identified and summarized trials on the effectiveness of diuretics, metformin, anticoagulants, longacting beta-agonists alone or in combination with inhaled corticosteroids, lipid lowering agents, exercise and diet. Eligible studies were reports of trials included in the Cochrane reviews and additional papers that described the methods of these trials. We assessed the exclusion and inclusion of people with comorbidities, the reporting of comorbidities, and whether comorbidities were considered as potential modifiers of treatment effects. Overall, the replicability of both the inclusion criteria (mean [standard deviation (SD)]: 6.0 (2.1), range (min-max): 1-9.5) and exclusion criteria(mean(SD): 5.3 (2.1), range: 1-9.5) was only moderate. Trials excluded patients with many common comorbidities. The proportion of exclusions for comorbidities ranged from 042 percent for heart failure, 0-55 percent for COPD, 0-44 percent for diabetes, and 0-39 percent for stroke. Seventy of the 161 trials (43.5%) described the prevalence of any comorbidity among participants with the index disease. The reporting of comorbidities in trials was very limited, in terms of reporting an operational definition and method of ascertainment for the presence of comorbidity and treatments for the comorbidity. It was even less common that the trials assessed whether comorbidities were potential modifiers of treatment effects. Conclusions: Comorbidities receive little attention in chronic disease trials. Given the public health importance of people with multiple chronic conditions, trials should better report on comorbidities and assess the effect comorbidities have on treatment outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic evidence maps as a novel tool to support evidence-based decision-making in chemicals policy and risk management
    Wolffe, Taylor A. M.
    Whaley, Paul
    Halsall, Crispin
    Rooney, Andrew A.
    Walker, Vickie R.
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 130
  • [22] The clinical efficacy of evidence-based nursing in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease combined with heart failure
    Mao, Qiaoyan
    Yan, Linqiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2020, 13 (02): : 1140 - 1147
  • [23] Identifying essential information to support patient decision-making regarding participation in cancer clinical trials: A Delphi study
    Kao, Chi-Yin
    Aranda, Sanchia
    Krishnasamy, Mei
    Hamilton, Bridget
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2018, 27 (06)
  • [24] The role of patient preferences in nursing decision-making in evidence-based practice: excellent nurses' communication tools
    Den Hertog, Ria
    Niessen, Theo
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2019, 75 (09) : 1987 - 1995
  • [25] Patient-centred decision-making? Biocitizens between evidence-based medicine and self-determination
    Jorgensen, Marianne Winther
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2015, 11 (03): : 311 - 329
  • [26] Evaluation of a Shared Decision-Making Intervention on the Utilization of Evidence-Based Psychotherapy in a VA Outpatient PTSD Clinic
    Hessinger, Jonathan D.
    London, Melissa J.
    Baer, Sheila M.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2018, 15 (04) : 437 - 441
  • [27] Redesigning an Autism Evidence-Based Practice Adoption and Decision-Making Implementation Toolkit for Middle and High Schools
    Locke, Jill J.
    Michael, Olivia G.
    Holt, Tana
    Drahota, Amy
    Dickson, Kelsey S.
    SCHOOL MENTAL HEALTH, 2024, 16 (03) : 727 - 745
  • [28] Polypharmacy and sustainable developmental goals: linking evidence-based medicine, patient engagement, and shared decision-making
    Komatsu, Yasuhiro
    RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [29] Access and usage of mobile health (mHealth) for communication, health monitoring, and decision-making among patients with multiple chronic diseases (comorbidities)
    Elkefi, Safa
    IISE TRANSACTIONS ON HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2024, 14 (03) : 179 - 192
  • [30] Evidence-based pelvic floor disorder care pathways optimize shared decision making between patients and surgeons
    Caldwell, Lauren
    Papermaster, Amy E.
    Halder, Gabriela E.
    White, Amanda B.
    Young, Amy
    Rogers, Rebecca G.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (10) : 2841 - 2847