Assessment of health-related quality of life in patients with lymphedema of the lower limb

被引:67
作者
Franks, PJ
Moffatt, CJ
Doherty, DC
Williams, AF
Jeffs, E
Mortimer, PS
机构
[1] Thames Valley Univ, Fac Hlth & Human Sci, Ctr Res & Implementat Clin Practice, London W5 2BS, England
[2] Haven Trust, London, England
[3] Univ London St Georges Hosp, Sch Med, London SW17 0RE, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00099.x
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the use of a number of tools in the evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients with lower limb lymphedema, and to determine the consequences of cancer history and concurrent leg ulceration. Patients in one health trust having lower limb lymphedema were identified and interviewed at entry and after 24 weeks. The short form-36 (SF-36), modified Barthel scale, McGill short form pain questionnaire, and Euroqol were administered at both time points. Of the 164 (median age = 76.9 years, 70.7% women) patients who comprised the study population, 15.2% had a history of cancer and 30.4% had coexisting current leg ulceration. Internal consistencies were high for all scales (Cronbach's alpha > 0.80). There were high ceiling effects for a number of SF-36 scores, and high floor effects in these and the McGill short form pain questionaire, scales. Despite these limitations, there was strong evidence that treatment led to significant improvements in six of eight scores of the SF-36, three of three scores of the McGill short form pain questionnaire and the modified Barthel scale (all p < 0.05). The improvement in physical functioning was significantly greater for patients who entered the study with a leg ulcer (mean different = 9.1, 95% confidence interval 2.1-16.1, p = 0.011). Patients treated with compression bandaging had significantly greater improvements for physical functioning (10.2) than those treated with compression hoisery (-1.5) or no treatment (-2.0), p = 0.001. Of the tools assessed, the SF-36, appears to be the most appropriate for use in this patient group.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 118
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, HLTH SURVEY MANUAL I
[2]  
Calman K., 1995, POLICY FRAMEWORK COM
[3]   The validation of a quality of life scale to assess the impact of arm morbidity in breast cancer patients post-operatively [J].
Coster, S ;
Poole, K ;
Fallowfield, LJ .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2001, 68 (03) :273-282
[4]  
de Godoy JMP, 2002, LYMPHOLOGY, V35, P72
[5]   CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT OF LYMPHOEDEMA OF THE LIMBS [J].
FOLDI, E ;
FOLDI, M ;
WEISSLEDER, H .
ANGIOLOGY, 1985, 36 (03) :171-180
[6]   THE USE OF FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT IN UNDERSTANDING HOME CARE NEEDS [J].
FORTINSKY, RH ;
GRANGER, CV ;
SELTZER, GB .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (05) :489-497
[7]  
Franks P J, 1998, J Wound Care, V7, P383
[8]   COMMUNITY LEG ULCER CLINICS - EFFECT ON QUALITY-OF-LIFE [J].
FRANKS, PJ ;
MOFFATT, CJ ;
CONNOLLY, M ;
BOSANQUET, N ;
OLDROYD, M ;
GREENHALGH, RM ;
MCCOLLUM, CN .
PHLEBOLOGY, 1994, 9 (02) :83-86
[9]   Health related quality of life in patients with venous ulceration: Use of the Nottingham health profile [J].
Franks, PJ ;
Moffatt, CJ .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (08) :693-700
[10]  
Hamer C, 1994, J Wound Care, V3, P99