Maintenance Nifedipine Tocolysis Compared With Placebo A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:46
作者
Lyell, Deirdre J. [1 ]
Pullen, Kristin M.
Mannan, Jana
Chitkara, Usha
Druzin, Maurice L.
Caughey, Aaron B.
El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Lucile S Packard Childrens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818d8386
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether maintenance nifedipine tocolysis after arrested preterm labor prolongs pregnancy and improves neonatal outcomes. METHODS: A prospective, randomized double-blind, multicenter study was conducted. After successful tocolysis, patients were randomly assigned to receive 20 mg nifedipine or an identical-appearing placebo every 4-6 hours until 37 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was attainment of 37 weeks of gestation. Patients were enrolled between 24 weeks and 34 weeks if they had six or fewer contractions per hour, intact membranes, and less than 4 cm cervical dilation. Exclusion criteria were placental abruption or previa, fetal anomaly incompatible with life, or maternal medical contraindication to tocolysis. Sixty-six patients were required for 80% power to detect a 50% reduction in birth before 37 weeks, with a two-tailed alpha of 0.05. Data were analyzed by intent to treat. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were randomly assigned. Two patients were excluded after randomization and one was lost to follow-up. Thirty-five patients received placebo, and 33 received nifedipine. There were no maternal demographic differences between groups; the placebo group was significantly more dilated and effaced at study entry. There was no difference in attainment of 37 weeks (39% nifedipine compared with 37% placebo, P >.91), mean delay of delivery (33.5 +/- 19.9 days nifedipine compared with 32.6 +/- 21.4 days placebo, P=.81) or delay of delivery for greater than 48 hours or 1, 2, 3, or 4 weeks. Neonatal outcomes were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: When compared with placebo, maintenance nifedipine tocolysis did not confer a large reduction in preterm birth or improvement in neonatal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1221 / 1226
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins--Obstetrics, 2003, Int J Gynaecol Obstet, V82, P127
  • [2] [Anonymous], EXP PHYSL
  • [3] COMPARISON OF NIFEDIPINE AND RITODRINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF PRETERM LABOR
    BRACERO, LA
    LEIKIN, E
    KIRSHENBAUM, N
    TEJANI, N
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1991, 8 (06) : 365 - 369
  • [4] BROWN SM, 1981, OBSTET GYNECOL, V57, P22
  • [5] Maintenance oral nifedipine for preterm labor: A randomized clinical trial
    Carr, DB
    Clark, AL
    Kernek, K
    Spinnato, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (04) : 822 - 827
  • [6] ORAL RITODRINE MAINTENANCE IN THE TREATMENT OF PRETERM LABOR
    CREASY, RK
    GOLBUS, MS
    LAROS, RK
    PARER, JT
    ROBERTS, JM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1980, 137 (02) : 212 - 219
  • [7] Oral betamimetics for maintenance therapy after threatened preterm labour
    Dodd, JM
    Crowther, CA
    Dare, MR
    Middleton, P
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (01):
  • [8] A COMPARISON OF TOCOLYSIS WITH NIFEDIPINE OR RITODRINE - ANALYSIS OF EFFICACY AND MATERNAL, FETAL, AND NEONATAL OUTCOME
    FERGUSON, JE
    DYSON, DC
    SCHUTZ, T
    STEVENSON, DK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 163 (01) : 105 - 111
  • [9] NIFEDIPINE PHARMACOKINETICS DURING PRETERM LABOR TOCOLYSIS
    FERGUSON, JE
    SCHUTZ, T
    PERSHE, R
    STEVENSON, DK
    BLASCHKE, T
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 161 (06) : 1485 - 1490
  • [10] Contemporary practice patterns and beliefs regarding tocolysis among US maternal-fetal medicine specialists
    Fox, Nathan S.
    Gelber, Shari E.
    Kalish, Robin B.
    Chasen, Stephen T.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (01) : 42 - 47