A conservation-tillage, cover-cropping strategy and economic analysis for creamer potato production

被引:11
作者
Carrera, LM
Morse, RD
Hima, BL
Abdul-Baki, AA
Haynes, KG
Teasdale, JR
机构
[1] USDA, ARS, Sustainable Agr Syst Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Hort, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[3] USDA, ARS, Vegetable Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
Solanum tuberosum; crimson clover; trifolium incarnatum; rye; Secale cereale; oat; Avena sativa; Austrian winter pea; Pisum sativum; rape; Brassica napus; sustainable agriculture;
D O I
10.1007/BF02872225
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A two-year experiment was conducted at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC), MD, and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Kentland Agricultural Research Farm (KARF), VA, to evaluate potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production of 32- to 57-mm-size-range tubers (referred to hereafter as creamers) in a conservation-tillage, cover-cropping strategy. The experiments used a split-plot design in which the main-plots were cover crop treatments and the sub-plots were different potato selections. Main plot treatments included rye (Secale cereale L.), crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.), Austrian winter pea (Pisum sativum L.), rape (Brassica napus L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), rye/crimson clover mixture, rape/crimson clover mixture, bare soil/raised beds, and bare soil/flat beds (control). Potato selections tested were B1145-2, B1491-5, and B1492-12 in 2000 and B1145-2, B1102-3, and B0811-4 in 2001. Yields in the conservation-tillage treatments were equal to or better than those in the bare soil/flat bed control with few exceptions. Large-sized tubers (< 57 mm) in almost all cases remained below 6% of total marketable yield even when the tubers were harvested late. Delayed harvest did not reduce creamer-sized yields nor did it increase yield of large-sized tubers. Economic analysis shows that net returns from some conservation-tillage treatments are equal to or higher than the conventional-tillage strategy and confirms the viability of the conservation-tillage, cover-cropping strategy. Furthermore, the conservation-tillage strategy in many cases allows timely planting using machinery in the wet soils of Maryland and Virginia during the narrow window of spring potato planting time, whereas the conventional tillage strategy does not offer this advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 479
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BENNETT OL, 1975, AGRON ABSTR AM SOC A, P137
[2]   EFFECT OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS, AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZERS ON YIELD COMPONENTS AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF POTATOES [J].
DUBETZ, S ;
BOLE, JB .
AMERICAN POTATO JOURNAL, 1975, 52 (12) :399-405
[3]   MINIMUM TILLAGE FOR POTATOES [J].
GRANT, WJ ;
EPSTEIN, E .
AMERICAN POTATO JOURNAL, 1973, 50 (06) :193-203
[4]   POTATO RESPONSE TO LEGUME AND FERTILIZER NITROGEN-SOURCES [J].
GRIFFIN, TS ;
HESTERMAN, OB .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1991, 83 (06) :1004-1012
[5]  
HONEYCUTT CW, 1998, PLANT FOOD HUM NUTR, V50, P1
[6]  
JOHNSON DM, 2002, 683 MAR COOP EXT SER
[7]   Tillage and rotation crop effects on weed dynamics in potato production systems [J].
Liebman, M ;
Drummond, FA ;
Corson, S ;
Zhang, JX .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1996, 88 (01) :18-26
[8]  
Mundy C., 1999, HortTechnology, V9, P240
[9]  
MURPHY HJ, 1959, MAINE AGR EXPT STA B, V583
[10]  
ODLAND TE, 1957, AM POTATO J, V34, P282