Energy polarization and popular representation: Evidence from the Russian Duma

被引:0
作者
Grigoriadi, Theocharis N. [1 ]
Torgler, Benno [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Polit Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Finance, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[3] CESifo Munich, Munich, Germany
关键词
Energy regulation; Market reform; Energy resources; Roll call votes; Legislative politics; State Duma; Russia; INSTITUTIONS; AGENDA; CONSEQUENCES; PARTIES; LESSONS; REFORM; POLICY; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2008.10.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this article we introduce the term "energy polarization" to explain the politics of energy market reform in the Russian Duma. Our model tests the impact of regional energy production. party cohesion and ideology, and electoral mandate on the energy policy decisions of the Duma deputies (oil, gas, and electricity bills and resolution proposals) between 1994 and 2003. We find a strong divide between Single-Member District (SMD) and Proportional Representation (PR) deputies High statistical significance of gas production is demonstrated throughout the three Duma terms and shows Gazprom's key position in the post-Soviet Russian economy. Oil production is variably significant in the two first Dumas, when the main legislative debates on oil privatization occur. There is no constant left-right continuum, which is consistent with the deputies' proclaimed party ideology. The pro- and anti-reform poles observed in our Poole-based single dimensional scale are not necessarily connected with liberal and state-oriented regulatory policies, respectively. Party switching is a solid indicator of Russia's polarized legislative dynamics when it comes to energy sector reform. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 334
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条