Time to Readiness for Discharge is a Valid and Reliable Measure of Short-Term Recovery After Colorectal Surgery

被引:65
作者
Fiore, Julio F., Jr. [1 ]
Faragher, Ian G. [2 ,3 ]
Bialocerkowski, Andrea [4 ]
Browning, Laura [1 ]
Denehy, Linda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Carlton, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Western Hosp, Div Surg, Footscray, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Western Hosp, Sch Clin, Footscray, Vic, Australia
[4] Griffith Univ, Sch Physiotherapy & Exercise Sci, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
关键词
RANDOMIZED-CLINICAL-TRIAL; LAPAROSCOPIC COLONIC RESECTION; LENGTH-OF-STAY; ENHANCED RECOVERY; HOSPITAL STAY; FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; EMERGENCY-SURGERY; FLUID MANAGEMENT; SAMPLE-SIZE;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-013-2208-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Short-term recovery after colorectal surgery has been traditionally investigated through length of stay (LOS). However, this measure is influenced by several confounding factors. This study aimed to investigate the construct validity and reliability of assessing the time to achieve standardized discharge criteria (time to readiness for discharge, or TRD) as a measure of short-term recovery. In a secondary analysis, we compared sample size requirements for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using TRD or LOS as outcome measures. Seventy patients participated in the construct validity study and 21 patients participated in the reliability study. TRD was defined as the number of days to achieve discharge criteria previously defined by consensus. Construct validity was investigated by testing six hypothesis based on the assumption that TRD measures short-term recovery. Reliability was calculated by comparing measures of TRD by two independent assessors. Variability estimates (standard deviations) of LOS and TRD were used for sample size calculations. Five of the six hypotheses were supported by the data (p < 0.05). Interobserver reliability was excellent (ICC2.1 = 0.99). Sample size estimations showed that RCTs using TRD as an outcome measure require approximately 23 % less participants compared to RCTs using LOS. The results of this research support the construct-validity and reliability of TRD as a measure of short-term recovery. Using TRD as an alternative to LOS may reduce sample size requirements in future RCTs.
引用
收藏
页码:2927 / 2934
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Perioperative care: a survey of New Zealand and Australian colorectal surgeons
    Kahokehr, A.
    Robertson, P.
    Sammour, T.
    Soop, M.
    Hill, A. G.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 13 (11) : 1308 - 1313
  • [22] Intraperitoneal Local Anesthetic Improves Recovery After Colon Resection A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kahokehr, Arman
    Sammour, Tarik
    Shoshtari, Kamran Zargar
    Taylor, Matthew
    Hill, Andrew G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 254 (01) : 28 - 38
  • [23] Detailed evaluation of functional recovery following laparoscopic or open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme
    King, P. M.
    Blazeby, J. M.
    Ewings, P.
    Kennedy, R. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2008, 23 (08) : 795 - 800
  • [24] Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme
    King, PM
    Blazeby, JM
    Ewings, P
    Franks, PJ
    Longman, RJ
    Kendrick, AH
    Kipling, RM
    Kennedy, RH
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (03) : 300 - 308
  • [25] Outcome and resource utilization in gastroenterological surgery
    Lång, M
    Niskanen, M
    Miettinen, P
    Alhava, E
    Takala, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (07) : 1006 - 1014
  • [26] Randomized clinical trial of epidural, spinal or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery
    Levy, B. F.
    Scott, M. J.
    Fawcett, W.
    Fry, C.
    Rockall, T. A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (08) : 1068 - 1078
  • [27] Machin D., 2008, SAMPLE SIZE TABLES C
  • [28] Laparoscopic colonic resection in fast-track patients does not enhance short-term recovery after elective surgery
    MacKay, G.
    Ihedioha, U.
    McConnachie, A.
    Serpell, M.
    Molloy, R. G.
    O'Dwyer, P. J.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 9 (04) : 368 - 372
  • [29] Randomized clinical trial of the effect of postoperative intravenous fluid restriction on recovery after elective colorectal surgery
    MacKay, G.
    Fearon, K.
    McConnachie, A.
    Serpell, M. G.
    Molloy, R. G.
    O'Dwyer, P. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (12) : 1469 - 1474
  • [30] A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection
    Maessen, J.
    Dejong, C. H. C.
    Hausel, J.
    Nygren, J.
    Lassen, K.
    Andersen, J.
    Kessels, A. G. H.
    Revhaug, A.
    Kehlet, H.
    Ljungqvist, O.
    Fearon, K. C. H.
    von Meyenfeldt, M. F.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (02) : 224 - 231