Effects of Adopting the New Global Lung Function Initiative 2012 Reference Equations on the Interpretation of Spirometry

被引:36
作者
Brazzale, Danny J. [1 ,2 ]
Hall, Graham L. [3 ,4 ]
Pretto, Jeffrey J. [2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Austin Hosp, Dept Resp & Sleep Med, Melbourne, Vic 3084, Australia
[2] Inst Breathing & Sleep, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Ctr Child Hlth Res, Telethon Inst Child Hlth Res, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[4] Princess Margaret Hosp Children, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] Univ Newcastle, John Hunter Hosp, Dept Resp & Sleep Med, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
[6] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
关键词
Respiratory function test; Obstruction; Restriction; Spirometry reference equations; REFERENCE VALUES; PULMONARY-FUNCTION; REFERENCE RANGES; AGE; CHILDREN; SAMPLE; SIZE;
D O I
10.1159/000352046
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The recently generated spirometry reference equations from the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI2012) provide a long-awaited opportunity for the adoption of a globally applicable set of normal reference values. Objective: The aim of this study was to document the likely interpretative effects of changing from commonly used current spirometry reference equations to the GLI2012 equations on interpretation of test results in a clinical spirometry dataset. Methods: Spirometry results from 2,400 patients equally distributed over the age range of 5-85 years were obtained from clinical pulmonary function laboratories at three public hospitals. The frequency of obstruction [FEV1/FVC below the lower limits of normal (LLN)] and spirometric restriction (FVC below the LLN) was assessed using the GLI2012, the National Health and Nutrition Assessment Survey (NHANES III), the European Community of Steel and Coal (ECSC) and the Stanojevic all-ages reference equations. Results: The rates of obstruction (range 20.0-28.5%) and spirometric restriction (range 14.2-25.8%) were similar across the four sets of reference equations. The highest level of agreement with the new GLI2012 equations was seen with the NHANES III equations (97.6% for obstruction and 93.6% for spirometric restriction) and the lowest with those from the ECSC (96.0 for obstruction and 92.0% for restriction). These data can be used to estimate likely diagnostic spirometry interpretation effects in the clinical setting when switching to GLI2012 spirometry reference data. Conclusions: We have found the effects on interpretation of changing to GLI2012 reference data to be minimal when changing from NHANES III and most significant when changing from ECSC reference data. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 189
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] How accurate is spirometry at predicting restrictive pulmonary impairment?
    Aaron, SD
    Dales, RE
    Cardinal, P
    [J]. CHEST, 1999, 115 (03) : 869 - 873
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, From the Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention
  • [3] Effects of changing reference values and definition of the normal range on interpretation of spirometry
    Brazzale, Danny J.
    Upward, Allyson L.
    Pretto, Jeffrey J.
    [J]. RESPIROLOGY, 2010, 15 (07) : 1098 - 1103
  • [4] Age- and size-related reference ranges: A case study of spirometry through childhood and adulthood
    Cole, T. J.
    Stanojevic, S.
    Stocks, J.
    Coates, A. L.
    Hankinson, J. L.
    Wade, A. M.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (05) : 880 - 898
  • [5] Discordance in Spirometric Interpretations Using Three Commonly Used Reference Equations vs National Health and Nutrition Examination Study III
    Collen, Jacob
    Greenburg, David
    Holley, Aaron
    King, Christopher S.
    Hnatiuk, Oleh
    [J]. CHEST, 2008, 134 (05) : 1009 - 1016
  • [6] CURRENT CONCEPTS - PULMONARY-FUNCTION TESTING
    CRAPO, RO
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [7] The Global Lung Initiative 2012 reference values reflect contemporary Australasian spirometry
    Hall, Graham L.
    Thompson, Bruce R.
    Stanojevic, Sanja
    Abramson, Michael J.
    Beasley, Richard
    Coates, Andrew
    Dent, Annette
    Eckert, Brenton
    James, Alan
    Filsell, Sue
    Musk, A. W.
    Nolan, Gary
    Dixon, Barbara
    O'Dea, Chris
    Savage, Jenni
    Stocks, Janet
    Swanney, Maureen P.
    [J]. RESPIROLOGY, 2012, 17 (07) : 1150 - 1151
  • [8] Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general US population
    Hankinson, JL
    Odencrantz, JR
    Fedan, KB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (01) : 179 - 187
  • [9] Stitching and switching: the impact of discontinuous lung function reference equations
    Kirkby, Jane
    Aurora, Paul
    Spencer, Helen
    Rees, Stephanie
    Sonnappa, Samantha
    Stocks, Janet
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2012, 39 (05) : 1256 - 1257
  • [10] Forced spirometry reference values for Norwegian adults: the Bronchial Obstruction in Nord-Trondelag study
    Langhammer, A
    Johnsen, R
    Gulsvik, A
    Holmen, TL
    Bjermer, L
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2001, 18 (05) : 770 - 779