Dynamic assessment elements and their prospective solutions in dynamic life cycle assessment of buildings

被引:38
作者
Su, Shu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaodong [3 ]
Zhu, Yimin [4 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Construct & Real Estate, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Engn Res Ctr Bldg Equipment Energy & Environm, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Construct Management, Sch Civil Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Construct Management, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Dynamic assessment elements; Temporal variations; Environmental impacts; Buildings; DEPENDENT CHARACTERIZATION FACTORS; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; LCA; TIME; ACIDIFICATION; PREDICTION; INVENTORY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.05.008
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a mature and widely used tool for quantifying environmental performance in the building sector. Temporal variations in building characteristics over their long life cycles significantly influence LCA results. Therefore, in recent years, dynamic LCA (DLCA) has become an emerging research field. However, DLCA research is still in its infancy, as demonstrated by the lack of systematic analysis regarding the dynamic aspects that should be considered. By examining the data transformation pathway in accordance with the standard LCA framework, this study formalizes four identified dynamic assessment elements (DAEs), namely dynamic consumption, dynamic basic inventory datasets, dynamic characterization factors, and dynamic weighting factors. A DLCA framework for buildings is proposed to enable the incorporation of DAEs into the static LCA framework. Furthermore, to better support the DLCA applications, viable prospective solutions and the availability of related data regarding the four DAEs are discussed. A case study shows that the assessment results are sensitive to the DAEs at varying degrees, and the DLCA model potentially offers a more realistic evaluation result. This study is expected to serve as a reference and provide guidelines for developing further in-depth DLCA models and methods that consider complex temporal variations.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 259
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [41] MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China), 2012, 2222011 MOHURD JGJT
  • [42] An operational methodology for applying dynamic Life Cycle Assessment to buildings
    Negishi, Koji
    Tiruta-Barna, Ligia
    Schiopu, Nicoleta
    Lebert, Alexandra
    Chevalier, Jacques
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 144 : 611 - 621
  • [43] Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA
    Ortiz, Oscar
    Castells, Francesc
    Sonnemann, Guido
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2009, 23 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [44] Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies
    Pehnt, M
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2006, 31 (01) : 55 - 71
  • [45] Pei L., 2015, STUDY ECODESIGN HIGH
  • [46] Normalisation and weighting in life cycle assessment: quo vadis?
    Pizzol, Massimo
    Laurent, Alexis
    Sala, Serenella
    Weidema, Bo
    Verones, Francesca
    Koffler, Christoph
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (06) : 853 - 866
  • [47] Comparison of the acidifying impact from emissions with different regional origin in life-cycle assessment
    Potting, J
    Schopp, W
    Blok, K
    Hauschild, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1998, 61 (1-3) : 155 - 162
  • [48] Potting J., 1998, Journal of Industrial Ecology, V2, P63, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.2.63, DOI 10.1162/JIEC.1998.2.2.63]
  • [49] Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment - A decade of method development to increase the environmental realism of LCIA
    Potting, Jose
    Hauschild, Michael Z.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2006, 11 (Suppl 1) : 11 - 13
  • [50] Project Team, 2011, SYNTHESIS