Using rewards and penalties to promote sustainability: Who chooses incentive-based electricity products and why?

被引:16
作者
Mahmoodi, Jasmin [1 ]
Hille, Stefanie [2 ]
Patel, Martin K. [3 ,4 ]
Brosch, Tobias [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Swiss Ctr Affect Sci, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ St Gallen, Inst Econ & Environm, St Gallen, Switzerland
[3] Univ Geneva, Inst Environm Sci ISE, Fac Sci, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Univ Geneva, Dept FA Forel Environm & Aquat Sci DEFSE, Fac Sci, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Univ Geneva, Dept Psychol, Geneva, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS; ENERGY-EFFICIENCY; GREEN ELECTRICITY; CONSUMER-BEHAVIOR; DECISION-MAKING; OPTIMISTIC BIAS; LOSS-AVERSION; DETERMINANTS; CONSUMPTION; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1002/cb.1870
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Incentives, both rewards and punishments, are effective instruments that have been embedded in electricity product designs to reduce electricity consumption. Reducing electricity consumption can considerably contribute to climate change mitigation. To better understand consumer preferences for incentive-based electricity products, a choice experiment using choice-based conjoint analysis was conducted among a representative sample of Swiss electricity consumers. Based on stated preferences for different product attributes, four consumer segments were identified. While two segments (49.6%) stated preference for incentive-based products, two other segments were less accepting of incentive components (particularly of penalties). We further explain the segments' preferences using psychographic characteristics, combining measures from psychology and behavioral economics. Precisely, environmental values and emotions, energy saving intentions and motives, perceived product attractiveness, as well as loss and risk aversion, and comparative optimism bias best described the segments. We align our findings with previous segmentation studies and argue for a stronger integration of behavioral economics in the environmental discourse. We further discuss the usefulness of consumer segmentation to develop tailored strategies that effectively target consumers' preferences and needs.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 398
页数:18
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
Albadi AH, 2007, IEEE POWER ENG SOC, P1665
[3]   Behavior and Energy Policy [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Mullainathan, Sendhil .
SCIENCE, 2010, 327 (5970) :1204-1205
[4]   Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences [J].
Andreoni, James ;
Sprenger, Charles .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (07) :3357-3376
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, P1, DOI [DOI 10.3000/19770677.L_2012.315.ENG, 10.3000/19770677.L_2012.315.eng]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Energy consumption in households Eurostate Statistics Explained
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, STUDY EVALUATING NAT
[8]   Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices [J].
Antonetti, Paolo ;
Maklan, Stan .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2014, 124 (01) :117-134
[9]   Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings [J].
Attari, Shahzeen Z. ;
DeKay, Michael L. ;
Davidson, Cliff I. ;
de Bruin, Waendi Bruine .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (37) :16054-16059
[10]   Making 'Smart Meters' smarter? Insights from a behavioural economics pilot field experiment in Copenhagen, Denmark [J].
Bager, Simon ;
Mundaca, Luis .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 28 :68-76