Effect of soil models on the prediction of tunnelling-induced deformations of structures

被引:17
作者
Giardina, Giorgia [1 ]
Losacco, Nunzio [2 ]
DeJong, Matthew J. [3 ]
Viggiani, Giulia M. B. [4 ]
Mair, Robert J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, Bath, Avon, England
[2] Univ Tor Vergata, Dept Civil Engn & Comp Sci, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Cambridge, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
computational mechanics; models (physical); tunnels & tunnelling; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; MASONRY FACADE SUBJECT; NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS; BUILDING RESPONSE; GROUND MOVEMENTS; CONSTITUTIVE MODEL; SURFACE-STRUCTURES; DAMAGE; CENTRIFUGE; PLASTICITY;
D O I
10.1680/jgeen.18.00127
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Computational modelling of the effect of underground excavations on adjacent structures has shown great potential to aid the assessment of tunnelling-induced damage to structures. However, the complexity of the mechanisms involved and the uncertainties connected to the use of sophisticated constitutive laws still limit the application of numerical modelling in civil engineering practice. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of soil models with different levels of complexity when predicting tunnelling-induced displacements of the soil surface, and consequently the assessment of building deformations. The performance of a non-linear elastic, a linear elastic-perfectly plastic and a critical-state-based kinematic hardening soil model were compared with the results of centrifuge testing of a tunnel excavation in sand. Results demonstrated that both the non-linear elastic and the kinematic hardening models are suitable to reproduce the effect of soil-structure interaction on the soil surface displacements and the building deformations, while also demonstrating the limitations of these methods in predicting local soil strains around the tunnel itself.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 397
页数:19
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   The influence of pre-failure soil stiffness on the numerical analysis of tunnel construction [J].
Addenbrooke, T. I. ;
Potts, D. M. ;
Puzrin, A. M. .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 1997, 47 (03) :693-712
[2]  
Amorosi A, 2014, GEOTECHNIQUE, V64, P118, DOI [10.1680/geot.13.P.032, 10.1680/geot.13.P032]
[3]  
Amorosi A, 2018, NUMER METHODS GEOTEC, VIX, P213
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, THESIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, THESIS
[7]   Three-dimensional finite element analysis of lined tunnels [J].
Augarde, CE ;
Burd, HJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 2001, 25 (03) :243-262
[8]   A STATE PARAMETER FOR SANDS [J].
BEEN, K ;
JEFFERIES, MG .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 1985, 35 (02) :99-112
[9]  
Bloodworth AG, 2002, THESIS
[10]   Finite Element modelling of tunnelling-induced displacements on framed structures [J].
Boldini, Daniela ;
Losacco, Nunzio ;
Bertolin, Sara ;
Amorosi, Angelo .
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 80 :222-231