Right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve replacement: 10-year experience of a single center

被引:47
作者
Glauber, Mattia [1 ]
Gilmanov, Daniyar [1 ]
Farneti, Pier Andrea [1 ]
Kallushi, Enkel [1 ]
Miceli, Antonio [1 ]
Chiaramonti, Francesca [1 ]
Murzi, Michele [1 ]
Solinas, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] G Pasquinucci Heart Hosp, Gabriele Monasterio Fdn, Dept Adult Cardiac Surg, I-54100 Massa, MS, Italy
关键词
aortic valve replacement; minimally invasive aortic valve replacement; right anterior minithoracotomy; sutureless aortic valve prosthesis; PROPENSITY SCORE ANALYSIS; CONVENTIONAL STERNOTOMY; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; MINISTERNOTOMY; THORACOTOMY; OPERATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) has been associated with several better outcomes over the standard full sternotomy approach. We revised our 10-year experience with right anterior minithoracotomy (RAMT) for AVR. Methods: Between 2004 and 2014, a total of 593 patients (310 men; median age: 73.8 years) underwent AVR via RAMT. Preoperatively, a mixed valve lesion was diagnosed in 55 (9.3%) patients; and pure aortic regurgitation in 86 (14.5%). Mean logistic EuroSCORE I (European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation) was 7.4 (median: 5.76). Results: In 302 (50.9%) patients, a sutureless or rapidly implantable biological prosthesis was used; in 23 (3.9%), a mechanical prosthesis; and in the remainder, a conventional biological prosthesis. A total of 113 (19.1%) patients had a small aortic annulus (<= 21 mm). Operative times averaged 80 (median: 74) minutes of crossclamping time, and 117 (107) minutes of perfusion time; these were significantly shorter with a sutureless prostheses, compared with a sutured prostheses: perfusion 99 versus 134 minutes, P < .0005; aortic crossclamping time: 64 versus 97 minutes, P < .0005. The mean (median) assisted ventilation time was 9.8 (6) hours; intensive care unit stay was 1.5 (1) days; hospital length of stay was 6.6 (6) days. Overall in-hospital mortality was 9 deaths (1.5%). At 31.5 months mean follow-up time (1531 cumulative patient-years), 94.8% survival was observed. Conclusions: Minimally invasive AVR is a safe procedure, with low perioperative morbidity, and low rates of reoperation and death at late follow-up. Excellent outcomes can be achieved with minimally invasive AVR via right anterior minithoracotomy. Sutureless prostheses facilitate minimally invasive AVR and are associated with reduced operative times.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: A study in 506 patients [J].
Bakir, I ;
Casselman, FP ;
Wellens, F ;
Jeanmart, H ;
De Geest, R ;
Degrieck, I ;
Van Praet, F ;
Vermeulen, Y ;
Vanermen, H .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2006, 81 (05) :1599-1604
[2]   Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery: Comparison of Outcomes in Matched Sternotomy and PORT ACCESS Groups [J].
Brinkman, William T. ;
Hoffman, William ;
Dewey, Todd M. ;
Culica, Dan ;
Prince, Syma L. ;
Herbert, Morley A. ;
Mack, Michael J. ;
Ryan, William H. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 90 (01) :131-135
[3]   Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Brown, Morgan L. ;
McKellar, Stephen H. ;
Sundt, Thoralf M. ;
Schaff, Hartzell V. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 137 (03) :670-U215
[4]   Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations [J].
Cosgrove, DM ;
Sabik, JF .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 62 (02) :596-597
[5]   Midterm results and quality of life after minimally invasive vs. conventional aortic valve replacement [J].
Detter, C ;
Deuse, T ;
Boehm, DH ;
Reichenspurner, H ;
Reichart, B .
THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2002, 50 (06) :337-341
[6]  
Elmandy HM, 2013, J HEART VALVE DIS, V22, P735
[7]   Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patientsaEuro [J].
Furukawa, Nobuyuki ;
Kuss, Oliver ;
Aboud, Anas ;
Schoenbrodt, Michael ;
Renner, Andre ;
Meibodi, Kavous Hakim ;
Becker, Tobias ;
Zittermann, Amin ;
Gummert, Jan F. ;
Boergermann, Jochen .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 46 (02) :221-227
[8]   Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: A real-world multi-institutional analysis [J].
Ghanta, Ravi K. ;
Lapar, Damien J. ;
Kern, John A. ;
Kron, Irving L. ;
Speir, Alan M. ;
Fonner, Edwin, Jr. ;
Quader, Mohammed ;
Ailawadi, Gorav .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 149 (04) :1060-1065
[9]  
Glauber M, 2006, MULTIMED MAN CARDIOT
[10]   Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: A propensity score matched study [J].
Glauber, Mattia ;
Miceli, Antonio ;
Gilmanov, Daniyar ;
Ferrarini, Matteo ;
Bevilacqua, Stefano ;
Farneti, Pier A. ;
Solinas, Marco .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 145 (05) :1222-1226