Risk management by SPV partners in toll road public private partnerships

被引:29
作者
Burke, Richard [1 ]
Demirag, Istemi [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Waterford Inst Technol, Finance, Waterford, Ireland
[2] Keele Management Sch, Accounting, Keele, Staffs, England
[3] Keele Management Sch, Keele, Staffs, England
[4] Hull Univ, Business Sch, Accounting, Ctr Accounting & Accountabil, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
[5] Queens Univ Belfast, Management Sch, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
Public private partnerships; risk; risk transfer; international SPV partners; sub-contractors; MONEY; UNCERTAINTY; CONTRACTS; PROJECTS; WORK; UK;
D O I
10.1080/14719037.2018.1523450
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Research on risk management in Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) has largely overlooked that the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) is made up of several project partners with different interests and objectives to manage risk. This paper makes an important contribution to this literature as it articulates SPV partners' perceptions of how they manage risk in toll road PPPs. Our case studies show that the different skillsets of both the international and domestic partners with their sub-contractors provide opportunities for mitigating and managing risk but also pose potential problems in terms of measuring and obtaining value for money for taxpayers.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 731
页数:21
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Ahadzi Marcus., 2004, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V22, P967
[2]  
Akintoye A.S., 1997, INT J PROJ MANAG, V15, P31, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00035-X
[3]  
Akinyemi B., 2009, Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, V8, P1
[4]   A disciplinary perspective on the epistemological status of risk [J].
Althaus, CE .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2005, 25 (03) :567-588
[5]  
[Anonymous], REV BUSINESS RES
[6]  
[Anonymous], ROUTLEDGE COMPANION
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2018, KITCH SINK TIM CAP I
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2005, LONDON
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2007, PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTN, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-075068054-7.50025-3
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J RES DEBATE PRACTIC