Cochlear implantation and hearing preservation: Results in 21 consecutively operated patients using the round window approach

被引:53
作者
Erixon, Elsa [1 ]
Kobler, Susanne
Rask-Andersen, Helge
机构
[1] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Cochlear implant; CI; ear; EAS; electro-acoustic stimulation; PARTIAL DEAFNESS; ELECTRODE; STIMULATION;
D O I
10.3109/00016489.2012.680198
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Conclusion: Prevalent hearing conservation may be achieved after round window (RW) cochlear implantation using soft and flexible electrode arrays if variations of RW anatomy, topography, and facial nerve position are considered. The most favorable electrode insertion depth remains to be established. Objectives: We assessed the incidence of cochlear function after cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion through the RW in our first 21 consecutively operated patients aimed at hearing conservation. Methods: Eleven patients had a preoperative low frequency hearing suitable for electro-acoustic stimulation. Hearing was preserved in an additional nine patients at their request with the intention to use full frequency CI stimulation. Anatomic variations of the RW were carefully considered using our temporal bone collection of micro-dissected ears. Electrode extension was assessed on X-ray by measuring the insertion angle of the first electrode and intra-cochlear length and correlated with audiometric data. Results: There was no incidence of total loss of residual hearing in any of the patients. A slight deterioration of low frequency thresholds occurred in some patients. Mean hearing loss at 125-500 Hz was 14.4 dB at 1 month following surgery and 15.6 dB after 1 year. Insertion angle (300-540 degrees) and depth (17.5-28.5 mm) were not statistically correlated to hearing loss.
引用
收藏
页码:923 / 931
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Is Electric Acoustic Stimulation Better Than Conventional Cochlear Implantation for Speech Perception in Quiet?
    Adunka, Oliver F.
    Pillsbury, Harold C.
    Adunka, Marcia C.
    Buchman, Craig A.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (07) : 1049 - 1054
  • [2] Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults
    Aschendorff, Antje
    Kromeier, Jan
    Klenzner, Thomas
    Laszig, Roland
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2007, 28 (02) : 75S - 79S
  • [3] Basura Gregory J., 2010, Oper. Tech. Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg., V21, P218
  • [4] Correlation of Early Auditory Potentials and Intracochlear Electrode Insertion Properties: An Animal Model Featuring Near Real-Time Monitoring
    Campbell, Adam P.
    Suberman, Thomas A.
    Buchman, Craig A.
    Fitzpatrick, Douglas C.
    Adunka, Oliver F.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (09) : 1391 - 1398
  • [5] SURGICAL APPROACH FOR A COCHLEAR IMPLANT - ANATOMICAL STUDY
    CLARK, GM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1975, 89 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [6] SURGERY FOR MULTIPLE-ELECTRODE COCHLEAR IMPLANTATIONS
    CLARK, GM
    PYMAN, BC
    BAILEY, QR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1979, 93 (03) : 215 - 223
  • [7] Variational Anatomy of the Human Cochlea: Implications for Cochlear Implantation
    Erixon, Elsa
    Hogstorp, Herman
    Wadin, Karin
    Rask-Andersen, Helge
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2009, 30 (01) : 14 - 22
  • [8] Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/nucleus hybrid implant
    Gantz, BJ
    Turner, C
    [J]. ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2004, 124 (04) : 344 - 347
  • [9] Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation
    Gstoettner, W
    Kiefer, J
    Baumgartner, WD
    Pok, S
    Peters, S
    Adunka, O
    [J]. ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2004, 124 (04) : 348 - 352
  • [10] A new electrode for residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: first clinical results
    Gstoettner, Wolfgang
    Helbig, Silke
    Settevendemie, Claudia
    Baumann, Uwe
    Wagenblast, Jens
    Arnoldner, Christoph
    [J]. ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2009, 129 (04) : 372 - 379