Enhancing the informed consent process in psychiatric outpatients with a brief computer-based method

被引:4
作者
Moran-Sanchez, Ines [1 ]
Luna, Aurelio [2 ]
Perez-Carceles, Maria D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Serv Murcia, Mental Hlth Ctr, Cartagena, Murcia, Spain
[2] Univ Murcia, Biomed Res Inst IMIB, Dept Legal & Forens Med, Fac Med, Reg Campus Int Excellence Campus Mare Nostrum, E-30001 Murcia, Spain
关键词
Computer-assisted; Decision-making; Consent form; Mental disorders; Research ethics; DECISIONAL CAPACITY; SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH; RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; COMPETENCE; IMPROVE; PEOPLE; TOOL; HOSPITALIZATION; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychres.2016.08.045
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Informed consent is a key element of ethical clinical research. Those with mental disorders may be at risk for impaired consent capacity. Problems with procedures may also contribute to patient's 'difficulties in understanding consent forms. The present investigation explores if a brief technologically based information presentation of the informed consent process may enhance psychiatric patients understanding and satisfaction. In this longitudinal, within-participants comparison study, patients who initially were judged to lack capacity to make research decisions (n=41) and a control group (n=47) were followed up. Decisional capacity, willingness to participate and cognitive and clinical scores were assessed at baseline and after receiving the computer-assisted enhanced consent. With sufficient cueing, patients with impaired research-related decision-making capacity at baseline were able to display enough understanding of the consent form. Patient satisfaction and willingness to participate also increased at follow up. Implications of these results for clinical practice and medical research involving people with mental disorders are discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 360
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] The need for additional safeguards in the informed consent process in schizophrenia research
    Anderson, Kelly K.
    Mukherjee, Som D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2007, 33 (11) : 647 - 650
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, RELIABILITY, DOI 10.1093/med/9780199685219.001.0001
  • [3] Appelbaum P.S., 2001, MacCAT-CR - MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research
  • [4] Baon B. S., SPANISH VALIDATION A
  • [5] Reliability of mental capacity assessments in psychiatric in-patients
    Cairns, R
    Maddock, C
    Buchanan, A
    David, AS
    Hayward, P
    Richardson, G
    Szmukler, G
    Hotopf, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 187 : 372 - 378
  • [6] Decisional capacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research
    Carpenter, WT
    Gold, JM
    Lahti, AC
    Queern, CA
    Conley, RR
    Bartko, JJ
    Kovnick, J
    Appelbaum, PS
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 57 (06) : 533 - 538
  • [7] Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: A review of instruments
    Dunn, Laura B.
    Nowrangi, Milap A.
    Palmer, Barton W.
    Jeste, Dilip V.
    Saks, Elyn R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 163 (08) : 1323 - 1334
  • [8] Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research
    Dunn, LB
    Candilis, PJ
    Roberts, LW
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2006, 32 (01) : 47 - 68
  • [9] ENDICOTT J, 1976, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V33, P766
  • [10] Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research - A systematic review
    Flory, J
    Emanuel, E
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (13): : 1593 - 1601