Three-dimensional flow dynamics around deflectors

被引:36
作者
Biron, PM
Robson, C
Lapointe, MF
Gaskin, SJ
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Geog Planning & Environm, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Geog, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
关键词
river rehabilitation; flow deflectors; deflector design; turbulent flow; bed shear stress; three-dimensional flow dynamics; recirculation zone; acoustic Doppler velocimeter;
D O I
10.1002/rra.852
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many river rehabilitation projects to enhance the aquatic habitat focus on the creation of pool and riffle habitat by the implementation of flow deflectors, with various degrees of successes and failures. A more comprehensive understanding of the complex three-dimensional flow dynamics that induces scour around instream structures is required for a more effective design. The objective of this study is to examine the three-dimensional mean and turbulent flow characteristics around paired flow deflectors for various types of deflector design in a laboratory flume. Three deflector angles (45 degrees, 90 degrees and 135 degrees) and two 44 deflector heights (with flow under and over the deflector height) were tested over a smooth (plexiglas) bed and a sand bed. Three-dimensional velocity measurements were taken with an acoustic Doppler velocimeter at several planform positions at two heights above the bed. Results show that the 90 degrees deflectors create the most important disturbance in the mean flow field, in turbulence intensity and bed shear stress. There is, however, a marked difference in the spatial distribution of the mean and turbulent parameters over a mobile bed and over a smooth, fixed bed. This stresses the importance of understanding the 14 feedback between bed topography and flow dynamics and limits the applicability of conclusions drawn from plane bed experiments to natural rivers. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:961 / 975
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Flow around bridge piers [J].
Ahmed, F ;
Rajaratnam, N .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1998, 124 (03) :288-300
[2]  
Ahmed P, 2000, J ENG MECH-ASCE, V126, P51
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Better trout habitat
[4]   Comparing different methods of bed shear stress estimates in simple and complex flow fields [J].
Biron, PM ;
Robson, C ;
Lapointe, MF ;
Gaskin, SJ .
EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2004, 29 (11) :1403-1415
[5]   Deflector designs for fish habitat restoration [J].
Biron, PM ;
Robson, C ;
Lapointe, MF ;
Gaskin, SJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2004, 33 (01) :25-35
[6]  
Brookes A, 1996, RIVER CHANNEL RESTOR, P1
[7]   Coherent structures in Flat-Bed abutment flow: Computational fluid dynamics simulations and experiments [J].
Chrisohoides, A ;
Sotiropoulos, F ;
Sturm, TW .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, 2003, 129 (03) :177-186
[8]  
Copp GH, 1997, REGUL RIVER, V13, P267, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199705)13:3<267::AID-RRR454>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-B
[10]   Scale effects in flume experiments on flow around a spur dike in flatbed channel [J].
Ettema, R ;
Muste, M .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2004, 130 (07) :635-646