Identifying ecosystem service hotspots for environmental management in Durban, South Africa

被引:16
作者
Davids, Rashieda [1 ]
Rouget, Mathieu [2 ]
Boon, Richard [3 ,5 ]
Roberts, Debra [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Agr Earth & Environm Sci, Durban, South Africa
[2] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Agr Earth & Environm Sci, Ctr Invas Biol, Durban, South Africa
[3] eThekwini Municipal, Environm Planning & Climate Protect Dept, Durban, South Africa
[4] eThekwini Municipal, Sustainable & Resilient City Initiat Unit, Durban, South Africa
[5] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Life Sci, Durban, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; BENEFITS; COSTS;
D O I
10.4102/abc.v46i2.2118
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Background: Despite considerable research into the importance of ecosystem services, little has been achieved in translating such research into management action. In an urban context where numerous pressures on ecosystem services exist, the identification and management of priority ecosystem services areas are vital to ensure the ongoing provision of these services. Method: To identify opportunities for securing a sustainable supply of ecosystem services for the city of Durban, this paper identifies ecosystem service priority areas, called hotspots, and assesses their spatial congruence with critical biodiversity areas (CBAs), conservation areas, the Durban Metropolitan Open Space System (D'MOSS) and land ownership categories, using spatial overlap and correlation analyses. Hotspots for 13 ecosystem services were identified and analysed, including carbon storage, nutrient retention, sediment retention, water supply and flood attenuation. Results: The study found generally weak correlations between ecosystem service hotspots and CBAs and conservation areas. On average, 30% of the 13 ecosystem services hotspots were located within terrestrial CBAs, 51% within the D'MOSS, with nominal overlaps of 0.3%, 3.9% and 5.07% within estuaries and freshwater CBAs and conservation areas, respectively. The majority of ecosystem service hotspots were located within communally (41%) or privately owned (27%) lands. Conclusion: The results indicated that substantial portions of hotspot areas lie outside of formally regulated and managed conservation areas and remain vulnerable to human impact and habitat degradation. The study identified management areas and options that could yield maximum benefits; including the need for the development of an ecosystem services management and protection strategy, the selection of areas for co-management of ecosystem service hotspots and CBAs and the need for collaborative management.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], NAT STRAT SUST DEV A
  • [2] [Anonymous], SUMMARY POLICYMAKERS
  • [3] [Anonymous], SYST CONS P IN PRESS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, EC ECOSYSTEMBIODIV
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being, V5, DOI DOI 10.1119/1.2344558
  • [6] [Anonymous], EC POLITICAL WEEKLY
  • [7] [Anonymous], CURRENT STATE TRENDS
  • [8] [Anonymous], ROL BIOD IMP ASS PRO
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2012, SPECIAL REPORT WORKI
  • [10] [Anonymous], STAT BIOD REP 2011 2