Dental anomalies in different growth and skeletal malocclusion patterns

被引:52
作者
Avelar Fernandez, Clarissa Christina [1 ]
Cruz Alves Pereira, Christiane Vasconcellos [1 ]
Luiz, Ronir Raggio [2 ]
Vieira, Alexandre Rezende [3 ]
Costa, Marcelo De Castro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent & Orthodont, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, IESC, Inst Studies Publ Hlth, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Oral Biol, Sch Dent Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
Dental anomaly; Malocclusion; Orthodontics; CONGENITAL TOOTH ANOMALIES; ORTHODONTIC PATIENTS; PREVALENCE; HYPODONTIA; FEATURES;
D O I
10.2319/071917-482.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate prevalence, distribution, and sexual dimorphism of dental anomalies (DA) among different skeletal malocclusions (SM) and growth patterns (GP) under the hypothesis that specific clinical patterns exist and may indicate common etiological roots. Materials and Methods: A total of 1047 orthodontic records of patients older than 8 years were evaluated. The SN-GoGn angle was used to classify GP (hypodivergent, normal, and hyperdivergent), and the ANB angle was used to verify SM (Angle Classes I, II, and III). These assessments were done from lateral cephalometric radiographs. DA were diagnosed using panoramic radiographs by one calibrated investigator. Odds ratios, chi-square, and Student's t-tests were used. Results: Of the subjects, 56.7% were female, with mean age of 16.41 (+/- 10.61) years. The prevalence of DA was 15.7%. Impaction and tooth agenesis were the most prevalent DA, with relative frequencies of 14.4% and 9.7%, respectively. DA were most prevalent in Class III SM (80.8%) and in hypodivergent GP (82.5%), although this was not statistically significant. Tooth agenesis (P < .01) and microdontia (P = .025) were significantly more common among hypodivergent GP and Class III SM, respectively. Conclusions: The results of this study support the idea that DA are preferentially associated with certain patterns of malocclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 201
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]  
Graber LW, 2012, ORTODONTIA PRINCIPIO
[12]  
Gunashekhar Madiraju, 2012, Prim Dent Care, V19, P35, DOI 10.1308/135576112798990773
[13]  
Kathariya Mitesh D, 2013, J Int Oral Health, V5, P10
[14]  
Kim YH, 2011, ISRN DENT
[15]   Studies of dental anomalies in a large group of school children [J].
Kuechler, Erika C. ;
Risso, Patricia A. ;
Costa, Marcelo de Castro ;
Modesto, Adriana ;
Vieira, Alexandre R. .
ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (10) :941-946
[16]   Defining subphenotypes for oral clefts based on dental development [J].
Letra, A. ;
Menezes, R. ;
Granjeiro, J. M. ;
Vieira, A. R. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2007, 86 (10) :986-991
[17]   Dental anomalies and clinical features in patients with maxillary canine impaction A retrospective study [J].
Mercuri, Emanuele ;
Cassetta, Michele ;
Cavallini, Costanza ;
Vicari, Donatella ;
Leonardi, Rosalia ;
Barbato, Ersilia .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2013, 83 (01) :22-28
[18]   Association between third molar agenesis and craniofacial structure development [J].
Ramiro-Verdugo, Jara ;
De Vicente-Corominas, Elena ;
Maria Montiel-Company, Jose ;
Luis Gandia-Franco, Jose ;
Bellot-Arcis, Carlos .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 148 (05) :799-804
[19]  
Sacerdoti R, 2004, ANGLE ORTHOD, V74, P725
[20]  
Sambataro S, 2005, ANGLE ORTHOD, V75, P28