Evaluation of photovoltaic-green and other roofing systems by means of ReCiPe and multiple life cycle-based environmental indicators

被引:45
作者
Lamnatou, Chr [1 ]
Chemisana, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lleida, Dept Environm Sci, Appl Phys Sect, Lleida 25001, Spain
关键词
Life cycle analysis (LCA); Photovoltaic (PV)-green roofs and buildings; IPCC GWP; ReCiPe; USEtox; Ecological footprint; Payback time;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.031
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The present study evaluates the environmental profile of a PV-green roof (PV panels over a soil/plant layer) and other roofing systems (PV-bitumen, PV-gravel, gravel, extensive green and intensive green). The analysis is based on multiple life-cycle impact assessment methodologies (ReCiPe, etc), several scenarios (for example with and without recycling) and it provides a deeper analysis as well as additional results to authors' previous investigation about PV-green roofs. The evaluation of the PV-green system (in terms of material manufacturing phase) shows that PV laminates (multi-Si) and steel components (joist, decking, balance of system) are responsible for the greatest part of the total footprint, based on GWP (global warming potential) and ReCiPe. Among the roofs which do not produce electricity, material manufacturing phase reveals that intensive green configuration has considerably higher impact in comparison with gravel and extensive green systems. Concerning PV roofs, PV-green configuration on a long-term basis (by considering material manufacturing, use phase, transportation and disposal), after a critical point, pays back its additional environmental impact (related with the "green layer") and it becomes more eco-friendly than the other two PV roofs. Certainly, this is due to the benefits (cooling effect of evapotranspiration, etc) of the soil/plant layer which result in PV output increase. The above mentioned critical point is determined by means of ReCiPe payback time and greenhouse-gas payback time. Several environmental indicators are calculated and presented along with results from the literature. A critical discussion is also provided. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 384
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SimaPro database manual
[2]  
Methods library
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
[4]   How "green" are the green roofs? Lifecycle analysis of green roof materials [J].
Bianchini, Fabricio ;
Hewage, Kasun .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 48 :57-65
[5]   Green roofs; building energy savings and the potential for retrofit [J].
Castleton, H. F. ;
Stovin, V. ;
Beck, S. B. M. ;
Davison, J. B. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2010, 42 (10) :1582-1591
[6]   Towards a green sustainable strategy for social neighbourhoods in Latin America: Case from social housing in Merida, Yucatan, Mexico [J].
Ceron-Palma, Ileana ;
Sanye-Mengual, Esther ;
Oliver-Sola, Jordi ;
Montero, Juan-Ignacio ;
Ponce-Caballero, Carmen ;
Rieradevall, Joan .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 38 :47-56
[7]  
Chan S.C., 2011, P JOINT S 2011 INT B
[8]   Photovoltaic-green roofs: An experimental evaluation of system performance [J].
Chemisana, D. ;
Lamnatou, Chr. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 119 :246-256
[9]   Life cycle assessment of layers of green roofs [J].
Chenani, Sanaz Bozorg ;
Lehvavirta, Susanna ;
Hakkinen, Tarja .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 90 :153-162
[10]   LCC and LCCO2 analysis of green roofs in elementary schools with energy saving measures [J].
Hong, TaeHoon ;
Kim, JiMin ;
Koo, ChoongWan .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 45 :229-239