A New Method for Triangular Fuzzy Compare Wise Judgment Matrix Process Based on Consistency Analysis

被引:37
作者
Meng, Fanyong [1 ]
Chen, Xiaohong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ Commerce, Sch Accounting, Changsha 410205, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Multiple criteria decision making; Triangular fuzzy compare wise judgment matrix; Fuzzy priority vector; Row weighted arithmetic mean method; Consistency analysis; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; MULTIPLICATIVE PREFERENCE RELATIONS; EXTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; REASONABLE PROPERTIES; WEIGHT GENERATION; INTERVAL; NUMBERS; INCONSISTENCY; ELEMENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s40815-016-0150-8
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
To cope with the uncertainty in the process of decision making, fuzzy preference relations are proposed and commonly applied in many fields. In practical decision-making problems, the decision maker may use triangular fuzzy preference relations to express his/her uncertainty. Based on the row weighted arithmetic mean method, this paper develops an approach for deriving the fuzzy priority vector from triangular fuzzy compare wise judgment matrices. To do this, this paper first analyzes the upper and lower bounds of the triangular fuzzy priority weight of each alternative, which indicates the decision maker's optimistic and pessimistic attitudes. Based on (acceptably) consistent multiplicative preference relations, the triangular fuzzy priority vector is obtained. Meanwhile, a consistency concept of triangular fuzzy compare wise judgment matrices is defined, and the consistent relationship between triangular fuzzy and crisp preference relations is studied. Different to the existing methods, the new approach calculates the triangular fuzzy priority weights separately. Furthermore, the fuzzy priority vector from trapezoidal fuzzy reciprocal preference relations is considered. Finally, the application of the new method to new product development (NDP) project screening is tested, and comparative analyses are also offered.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 46
页数:20
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   The geometric consistency index:: Approximated thresholds [J].
Aguarón, J ;
Moreno-Jiménez, JM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 147 (01) :137-145
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, UNCERTAINTY INTELLIG
[3]  
Arbel A., 1990, P 9 INT S MULT DEC M
[4]   MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS WITH FUZZY PAIRWISE COMPARISONS [J].
BOENDER, CGE ;
DEGRAAN, JG ;
LOOTSMA, FA .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 29 (02) :133-143
[5]   A note on the article "Inconsistency of pair-wise comparison matrix with fuzzy elements based on geometric mean" [Fuzzy Sets and Systems 161 (2010) 1604-1613] [J].
Brunelli, Matteo .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2011, 176 (01) :76-78
[6]   FUZZY HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (03) :233-247
[7]  
Calantone RJ, 1999, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V16, P65, DOI 10.1016/S0737-6782(98)00036-8
[8]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[9]   Group-based ER-AHP system for product project screening [J].
Chin, Kwai-Sang ;
Xu, Dong-ling ;
Yang, Jian-Bo ;
Lam, James Ping-Kit .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2008, 35 (04) :1909-1929
[10]   A NOTE ON THE ANALYSIS OF SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENT MATRICES [J].
CRAWFORD, G ;
WILLIAMS, C .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 29 (04) :387-405