Assessing the clinical significance of change scores following carpal tunnel surgery

被引:39
作者
Amirfeyz, Rouin [2 ]
Pentlow, Alanna [2 ]
Foote, Julian [2 ]
Leslie, Ian [1 ]
机构
[1] Bristol Royal Infirm & Gen Hosp, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Avon Orthopaed Ctr, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
QUESTIONNAIRE; QUALITY; RESPONSIVENESS; DASH;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-007-0471-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article presents a prospective longitudinal study to determine the cut-off values for change scores of DASH, Levine, and Kamath questionnaires to distinguish clinical improvement following carpal tunnel surgery. Fifty-four patients (40 female, 14 male), with positive nerve conduction studies, were prospectively followed up. Three questionnaires (DASH, Levine, and Kamath) were posted to patients at four and two weeks prior to their operation and then six weeks following surgery. A patient global impression of change (PGIC) score was completed for patients to rate the overall change in their symptoms. According to the PGIC, 93% of patients improved. The cut-off values for raw change scores that best define clinically significant improvement following carpal tunnel release were 20.9 for DASH, 0.47 for Levine, and 1.97 for the Kamath questionnaire. This study provides a methodological framework for identifying clinically significant changes following treatment. A questionnaire follow-up of patients is now possible using the data provided.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 185
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: The relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease-specific, and physical examination measures [J].
Amadio, PC ;
Silverstein, MD ;
Ilstrup, DM ;
Schleck, CD ;
Jensen, LM .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 21A (03) :338-346
[2]  
Beaton D E, 2001, J Hand Ther, V14, P128
[3]   Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand - which one to choose? [J].
Changulani, Manish ;
Okonkwo, Ugochuku ;
Keswani, Tulsi ;
Kalairajah, Yegappan .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2008, 32 (01) :1-6
[4]   Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Berlin, JA ;
Kinman, JL ;
Strom, BL .
PAIN, 2000, 88 (03) :287-294
[5]   Dash and boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: What is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire? [J].
Greenslade, JR ;
Mehta, RL ;
Belward, P ;
Warwick, DJ .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2004, 29B (02) :159-164
[6]   The quality of reporting and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials related to upper-extremity disorders [J].
Gummesson, C ;
Atroshi, I ;
Ekdahl, C .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 29A (04) :727-734
[7]   Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials [J].
Guyatt, GH ;
Juniper, EF ;
Walter, SD ;
Griffith, LE ;
Goldstein, RS .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7132) :690-693
[8]  
Guyette Todd M, 2004, J Surg Orthop Adv, V13, P206
[9]   Assessment of outcome of carpal tunnel syndrome: A comparison of electrophysiological findings and a self-administered Boston questionnaire [J].
Heybeli, N ;
Kutluhan, S ;
Demirci, S ;
Kerman, M ;
Mumcu, EF .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2002, 27B (03) :259-264
[10]  
Hudak PL, 1996, AM J IND MED, V29, P602, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO